132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21335573)
1. Strong's objections to the future of value account.
Marquis D
J Med Ethics; 2011 Jun; 37(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 21335573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion: Strong's counterexamples fail.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2009 May; 35(5):304-5; discussion 326-7. PubMed ID: 19407035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the 'future like ours' argument.
Strong C
J Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 38(9):567-9. PubMed ID: 22505733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing.
Di Nucci E
Med Health Care Philos; 2015 Nov; 18(4):587-90. PubMed ID: 25608793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2009 Oct; 35(10):651-2. PubMed ID: 19793949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.
Wrigley A
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e15-8. PubMed ID: 23637455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
Giubilini A; Minerva F
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 22361296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The deprivation argument against abortion.
Stretton D
Bioethics; 2004 Apr; 18(2):144-80. PubMed ID: 15148946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identity, killing, and the boundaries of our existence.
DeGrazia D
Philos Public Aff; 2003; 31(4):413-42. PubMed ID: 14680000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Buddhism and the morality of abortion.
Barnhart MG
J Buddh Ethics; 1998; 5():276-97. PubMed ID: 16526121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion, infanticide, and the asymmetric value of human life.
Reiman J
J Soc Philos; 1996; 27(3):181-200. PubMed ID: 15069941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's 'Future-Like-Ours' Argument.
Reitan E
Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 26424415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing.
Marquis D
J Med Ethics; 2001 Dec; 27(6):363-9. PubMed ID: 11731597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Birth, meaningful viability and abortion.
Jensen D
J Med Ethics; 2015 Jun; 41(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 25012846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two moral strategies regarding abortion.
Korcz KA
J Soc Philos; 2002; 33(4):581-605. PubMed ID: 16619462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A critique of "the best secular argument against abortion".
Strong C
J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):727-31. PubMed ID: 18827103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impairment Argument and Future-Like-Ours: A Problematic Dependence.
Bobier C
J Bioeth Inq; 2023 Sep; 20(3):353-357. PubMed ID: 37278912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The substance view: a critique (part 2).
Lovering R
Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):378-86. PubMed ID: 22994595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Killing fetuses and killing newborns.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e19-20. PubMed ID: 23637456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What philosophy of mind can tell us about the morality of abortion: personhood, materialism, and the existence of self.
Himma KE
Int J Appl Philos; 2003; 17(1):89-109. PubMed ID: 15040350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
