These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21337278)
1. A moderate zero line approach: opposing thresholds beyond the zero line. Chen YC; Chen YY Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):41-2. PubMed ID: 21337278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Shedding light on the gray zone. Wilkinson DJ Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21337266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cloudy crystal balls do not "gray" babies make. Silvers A; Francis L Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 21337276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Life and death choices in neonatal care: applying shared decision-making focused on parental values. Kon AA Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):35-6. PubMed ID: 21337275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal decision-making: beyond the standard of best interests. Truog RD; Sayeed SA Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):44-5. PubMed ID: 21337280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Standards, norms, and guidelines for permissible withdrawal of life support from seriously compromised newborns. Paris JJ Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):33-4. PubMed ID: 21337274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The locus of decision making for severely impaired newborn infants. Sade RM Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 21337277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Controversial end-of-life issues in the neonatal intensive care unit. Isaacs D Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 21337279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A life worth giving? The threshold for permissible withdrawal of life support from disabled newborn infants. Wilkinson DJ Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):20-32. PubMed ID: 21337273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The moral status of the newborn and its implications for medical decision making. Ross LF Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(5):349-55. PubMed ID: 17975740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities. Barry RL Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When life becomes optional: a comment on Kevin O'Rourke's approach to forgoing life support. Mikochik SL Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 7829308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The abnormal child--moral dilemmas of doctors and parents. Hare RM Doc Med Ethics; 1974 Apr; (3):. PubMed ID: 11662937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to live: priority and the roles of physicians. Riddle CA Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 20229430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Withholding or withdrawing life support for newborns: today's ethical problem in neonatology. Nicolopoulos DA Prenat Neonatal Med; 1998 Jun; 3(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 11660657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain death, vegetative state and the RUB: how does one arrive at the decision that a person's life is no longer worth living? Gillett G Issues Med Ethics; 1999; 7(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 16323323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A dispute in withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Prendergast TJ Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2000; ():3, 8. PubMed ID: 15584145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Response to open peer commentaries for "Unnecessary time pressure in refusal of life-sustaining therapies". Cochrane TI Am J Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(4):W5-6. PubMed ID: 19326301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Life, death, and harm: staying within the boundaries of nonmaleficence. Woien S Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 19061106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn. Portela C Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]