These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21337283)

  • 21. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Timing of tactile and visuo-tactile events is impaired in patients with cervical dystonia.
    Tinazzi M; Fiorio M; Bertolasi L; Aglioti SM
    J Neurol; 2004 Jan; 251(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 14999494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Range effects in successive discrimination.
    Hinson JM; Lockhead GR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Jul; 12(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 3734695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Subjective duration and psychophysics.
    Eisler H
    Psychol Rev; 1975 Nov; 82(6):429-50. PubMed ID: 1187910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Violation of the scalar property for time perception between 1 and 2 seconds: evidence from interval discrimination, reproduction, and categorization.
    Grondin S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):880-90. PubMed ID: 22390291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Time, number and length: similarities and differences in discrimination in adults and children.
    Droit-Volet S; Clément A; Fayol M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008; 61(12):1827-46. PubMed ID: 19031154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of stimulus discriminability on strategies for learning multiple temporal discriminations.
    Guilhardi P; Menez M; Caetano MS; Church RM
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):476-83. PubMed ID: 20067826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities.
    Ellinghaus R; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29309193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond.
    Hegdé J
    Prog Neurobiol; 2008 Apr; 84(4):405-39. PubMed ID: 17976895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decay of internal reference information in duration discrimination: Intertrial interval modulates the Type B effect.
    Ellinghaus R; Gick M; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1578-1586. PubMed ID: 30282525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Two-stimulus--two choice paradigm for psychophysics: range-frequency model and adaptation level theory in comparison].
    Sander K; Sarris V
    Z Exp Psychol; 1997; 44(3):431-46. PubMed ID: 9522678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audiotactile temporal order judgments.
    Zampini M; Brown T; Shore DI; Maravita A; Röder B; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):277-91. PubMed ID: 15698825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acquisition versus steady state in the time-left experiment.
    Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16343806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of delays on human performance on a temporal discrimination procedure: evidence of a choose-short effect.
    Lieving LM; Lane SD; Cherek DR; Tcheremissine OV
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):135-43. PubMed ID: 16289517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of early visual cortex interferes with subjective visual awareness and objective forced-choice performance.
    Koivisto M; Railo H; Salminen-Vaparanta N
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 20863717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009).
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1155-78. PubMed ID: 20436208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.