These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21337358)

  • 1. Estimating propensity scores with missing covariate data using general location mixture models.
    Mitra R; Reiter JP
    Stat Med; 2011 Mar; 30(6):627-41. PubMed ID: 21337358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A latent class model to multiply impute missing treatment indicators in observational studies when inferences of the treatment effect are made using propensity score matching.
    Mitra R
    Biom J; 2023 Mar; 65(3):e2100284. PubMed ID: 36418159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation.
    Mitra R; Reiter JP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):188-204. PubMed ID: 22687877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of propensity scores using generalized additive models.
    Woo MJ; Reiter JP; Karr AF
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3805-16. PubMed ID: 18366144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1202-17. PubMed ID: 18972454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propensity score matching with time-dependent covariates.
    Lu B
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):721-8. PubMed ID: 16135023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.
    Arbogast PG; Ray WA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 21749976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects.
    Franklin JM; Rassen JA; Ackermann D; Bartels DB; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(10):1685-99. PubMed ID: 24323618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple adjustments for randomized trials with nonrandomly missing or censored outcomes arising from informative covariates.
    Baker SG; Fitzmaurice GM; Freedman LS; Kramer BS
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jan; 7(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15923407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies.
    Austin PC
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(6):661-77. PubMed ID: 19684288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.
    Månsson R; Joffe MM; Sun W; Hennessy S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 166(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 17504780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of several imputation methods for missing baseline data in propensity scores analysis of binary outcome.
    Crowe BJ; Lipkovich IA; Wang O
    Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(4):269-79. PubMed ID: 19718652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis.
    Choi J; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 30341708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regression analysis with missing covariate data using estimating equations.
    Zhao LP; Lipsitz S; Lew D
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1165-82. PubMed ID: 8962448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.