These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21337662)
1. Prevalence of uterine anomalies and their impact on early pregnancy in women conceiving after assisted reproduction treatment. Jayaprakasan K; Chan YY; Sur S; Deb S; Clewes JS; Raine-Fenning NJ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 21337662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study. Prior M; Richardson A; Asif S; Polanski L; Parris-Larkin M; Chandler J; Fogg L; Jassal P; Thornton JG; Raine-Fenning NJ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 29055072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No clinical relevance of the height of fundal indentation in subseptate or arcuate uterus: a prospective study. Gergolet M; Campo R; Verdenik I; Kenda Suster N; Gordts S; Gianaroli L Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 May; 24(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 22417666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive outcomes in women with uterine anomalies. Lin PC J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15006276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical length and quantitative fetal fibronectin in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women with congenital uterine anomaly. Ridout AE; Ibeto LA; Ross GN; Cook JR; Sykes L; David AL; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Bennett PR; Terzidou V; Shennan AH; Chandiramani M; ; Brown RG; Chatfield S; Sadeh D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):341.e1-341.e9. PubMed ID: 31132343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Müllerian duct anomalies diagnosed by saline contrast sonohysterography: prevalence in a general population. Dreisler E; Stampe Sørensen S Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):525-9. PubMed ID: 24875399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Woelfer B; Salim R; Banerjee S; Elson J; Regan L; Jurkovic D Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 98(6):1099-103. PubMed ID: 11755560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Tomaževič T; Ban-Frangež H; Virant-Klun I; Verdenik I; Požlep B; Vrtačnik-Bokal E Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 20864409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Chan YY; Jayaprakasan K; Tan A; Thornton JG; Coomarasamy A; Raine-Fenning NJ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 21830244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional scan of the uterine cavity of infertile women before assisted reproductive technology use. Pleş L; Alexandrescu C; Ionescu CA; Arvătescu CA; Vladareanu S; Moga MA Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12764. PubMed ID: 30313087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Jurkovic D; Geipel A; Gruboeck K; Jauniaux E; Natucci M; Campbell S Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 5(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 7600203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of congenital uterine anomalies on reproductive outcomes of IVF/ICSI-embryo transfer: a retrospective study. Kang J; Qiao J Eur J Med Res; 2024 Jan; 29(1):48. PubMed ID: 38212852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Salim R; Regan L; Woelfer B; Backos M; Jurkovic D Hum Reprod; 2003 Jan; 18(1):162-6. PubMed ID: 12525460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted reproductive technology outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Fedele F; Bulfoni A; Parazzini F; Levi-Setti PE; Busnelli A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Nov; 310(5):2315-2332. PubMed ID: 39227392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss. Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozaki Y; Katano K; Suzumori N; Mizutani E Semin Reprod Med; 2011 Nov; 29(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 22161464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of the 'uterine factor' in recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective cohort study on women screened through 3D transvaginal ultrasound. Busnelli A; Barbaro G; Pozzati F; D'Ippolito S; Cristodoro M; Nobili E; Scambia G; Di Simone N Hum Reprod; 2024 Aug; 39(8):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 38964365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]