181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21338028)
1. The right to withdraw from research.
Schaefer GO; Wertheimer A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Dec; 20(4):329-52. PubMed ID: 21338028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Against the inalienable right to withdraw from research.
Chwang E
Bioethics; 2008 Aug; 22(7):370-8. PubMed ID: 18549425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Free-riding and research ethics.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research participation and the right to withdraw.
Edwards SJ
Bioethics; 2005 Apr; 19(2):112-30. PubMed ID: 15943021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples.
Helgesson G; Johnsson L
Med Health Care Philos; 2005; 8(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16283494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unacceptable risk in pregnancy: whose choice and responsibility?
Perry C
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 21534159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical genetic research on human subjects.
Harris J
Jurimetrics; 1999; 40():77-91. PubMed ID: 16285118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beginning anew: same principles, different direction for research ethics.
Simmerling M; Schwegler B
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):44-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Vulnerability as the inability of researchers to act in the best interest of a subject.
VanderWalde AM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):65-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics.
McGuire AL; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W1-2. PubMed ID: 16036642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients".
McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7. PubMed ID: 21534136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Physician duties in the conduct of human subject research.
Fried E
Account Res; 2001; 8(4):349-75. PubMed ID: 12481789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What should subjects be told about withdrawing from a protocol?
Levine RJ
IRB; 1981 Nov; 3(9):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A legal duty to disclose individual research findings to research subjects?
Gordon MP
Food Drug Law J; 2009; 64(1):225-60. PubMed ID: 19998747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rethinking adolescent assent: a triangular approach.
Trivedi AD
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):75-6. PubMed ID: 16179324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent: views from Karachi.
Jafarey A
East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S50-5. PubMed ID: 17037689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monetary inducement to research participation.
Palmer WE
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985; 48(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 3975268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust.
de Melo-MartÃn I; Ho A
J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 18316464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
