169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21338029)
1. Does it matter whether investigators intend to benefit research subjects?
Wendler D; Abdoler E
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Dec; 20(4):353-70. PubMed ID: 21338029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The therapeutic misconception, beneficence, and respect.
Fried E
Account Res; 2001; 8(4):331-48. PubMed ID: 12481794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Essentials of research ethics for healthcare professionals.
Aita M; Richer MC
Nurs Health Sci; 2005 Jun; 7(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 15877688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust.
de Melo-MartÃn I; Ho A
J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 18316464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eschewing definitions of the therapeutic misconception: a family resemblance analysis.
Goldberg DS
J Med Philos; 2011 Jun; 36(3):296-320. PubMed ID: 21606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician duties in the conduct of human subject research.
Fried E
Account Res; 2001; 8(4):349-75. PubMed ID: 12481789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vulnerability as the inability of researchers to act in the best interest of a subject.
VanderWalde AM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):65-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dissemination to research subjects: operationalizing investigator accountability.
Zlotnik Shaul R; Reid L; Essue B; Gibson J; Marzinotto V; Daneman D
Account Res; 2005; 12(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 16021788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research ethics.
Aarons D
West Indian Med J; 1995 Dec; 44(4):115-8. PubMed ID: 8838046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A legal duty to disclose individual research findings to research subjects?
Gordon MP
Food Drug Law J; 2009; 64(1):225-60. PubMed ID: 19998747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials.
Henderson GE; Easter MM; Zimmer C; King NM; Davis AM; Rothschild BB; Churchill LR; Wilfond BS; Nelson DK
Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jan; 62(1):239-53. PubMed ID: 16000230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whatever Happened to Human Experimentation?
Elliott C
Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 26659598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants.
Shalowitz DI; Miller FG
J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):e17. PubMed ID: 18757617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-experimentation.
Davis JK
Account Res; 2003; 10(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 14979319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward a theory of control of medical experimentation with human subjects: the role of compensation.
Adams BR; Shea-Stonum M
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):604-48. PubMed ID: 11661167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical considerations in the communication of unexpected information with clinical implications.
Lavieri RR; Garner SA
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):46-8; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The ethics of scientific investigation involving humans.
Pellegrino ED
Riv Ital Pediatr; 1989 Jun; 15(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 11659239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical human-research protections: not universal and not uniform.
Fleming DA; Reynolds D
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):21-2. PubMed ID: 19061102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent in medical experimentation.
Burgess MM
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1987 Jan; 20(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 11649817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation.
Dickert N; Grady C
N Engl J Med; 1999 Jul; 341(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 10403861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]