These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2133835)

  • 1. Technique of implantation of the Medtronic-Hall valve and other modern tilting-disc prostheses.
    Antunes MJ
    J Card Surg; 1990 Jun; 5(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 2133835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
    Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acute postoperative block of mechanical prostheses: incidence and treatment.
    Santé P; Renzulli A; Festa M; Vitale N; Mollo A; Dialetto G; De Luca L
    Cardiovasc Surg; 1994 Jun; 2(3):403-6. PubMed ID: 8049985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disc immobilization of Björk-Shiley and Medtronic Hall valves during and immediately after valve replacement.
    Pai GP; Ellison RG; Rubin JW; Moore HV; Kamath MV
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1987 Jul; 44(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 3606263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses.
    Brawley RK; Donahoo JS; Gott VL
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 124127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves].
    Kawazoe K; Kawaguchi O; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Fujita T
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1534-7. PubMed ID: 2586460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The optimal opening angle of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Björk VO
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981; 15(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 7347890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.
    Sethia B; Turner MA; Lewis S; Rodger RA; Bain WH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Mar; 91(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 3951241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro fluid dynamic characteristics of the Medtronic-Hall pivoting disc heart valve prosthesis.
    Yoganathan AP; Stevenson DM; Williams FP; Woo YR; Franch RH; Harrison EC
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982; 16(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 6221405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Doppler ultrasound of normally functioning mechanical mitral and aortic valve prostheses.
    Gibbs JL; Wharton GA; Williams GJ
    Int J Cardiol; 1988 Mar; 18(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 3360523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cineradiographic functional evaluation of the Björk-Shiley monostrut prosthesis. A follow-up study of 46 consecutive patients.
    Albrechtsson UG; Thulin LI; Olin CL
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987; 21(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 3589598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hemodynamic comparison of Omniscience and Medtronic Hall aortic prostheses.
    Plehn JF; Arbuckle BE; Southworth J; Nugent W; Plume S; Marrin CA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 May; 5(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 8793686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined mitral and aortic valve replacement with Bjørk-Shiley prostheses: long term survival and valve-related complications.
    Kaul TK; Mercer JL
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Oct; 38(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 2264039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting-disc prosthesis.
    Messmer BJ; Okies JE; Hallman GL; Cooley DA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1971 Dec; 62(6):938-46. PubMed ID: 4942974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses.
    Walker PG; Yoganathan AP
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs.
    Kleine P; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Ackermann H; Moritz A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Nov; 124(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 12407375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative phonocardiographic, echocardiographic and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of normally functioning Medtronic Hall and Björk-Shiley mitral prosthetic valves.
    Fukuda N; Oki T; Tabata T; Hosoi K; Iuchi A; Manabe K; Kageji Y; Sasaki M; Hama M; Ito S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 May; 3(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 8087264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medtronic-Hall prosthetic aortic valve.
    Akins CW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 8843515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Four years' experience of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting-disc prosthesis.
    Larmi TK; Kärkölä P; Kairaluoma MI; Takkunen J
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1976; 65(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 962274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves.
    Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.