These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21338505)

  • 1. Simulated evolution applied to study the genetic code optimality using a model of codon reassignments.
    Santos J; Monteagudo A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 12():56. PubMed ID: 21338505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of the genetic code adaptability by means of a genetic algorithm.
    Santos J; Monteagudo A
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Jun; 264(3):854-65. PubMed ID: 20219479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inclusion of the fitness sharing technique in an evolutionary algorithm to analyze the fitness landscape of the genetic code adaptability.
    Santos J; Monteagudo Á
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):195. PubMed ID: 28347270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multiobjective approach to the genetic code adaptability problem.
    de Oliveira LL; de Oliveira PS; Tinós R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():52. PubMed ID: 25879480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape.
    Novozhilov AS; Wolf YI; Koonin EV
    Biol Direct; 2007 Oct; 2():24. PubMed ID: 17956616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of crossover operator in evolutionary-based approach to the problem of genetic code optimization.
    Błażej P; Wnȩtrzak M; Mackiewicz P
    Biosystems; 2016 Dec; 150():61-72. PubMed ID: 27555085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm.
    Wnętrzak M; Błażej P; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):192. PubMed ID: 30545289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The genetic code is very close to a global optimum in a model of its origin taking into account both the partition energy of amino acids and their biosynthetic relationships.
    Caldararo F; Di Giulio M
    Biosystems; 2022 Apr; 214():104613. PubMed ID: 35085754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Many alternative and theoretical genetic codes are more robust to amino acid replacements than the standard genetic code.
    Błażej P; Wnętrzak M; Mackiewicz D; Gagat P; Mackiewicz P
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Mar; 464():21-32. PubMed ID: 30579955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of the standard genetic code according to three codon positions using an evolutionary algorithm.
    Błażej P; Wnętrzak M; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201715. PubMed ID: 30092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An alternative look at code evolution: using non-canonical codes to evaluate adaptive and historic models for the origin of the genetic code.
    Morgens DW; Cavalcanti AR
    J Mol Evol; 2013 Feb; 76(1-2):71-80. PubMed ID: 23344715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the optimality of the genetic code, with the consideration of coevolution theory by comparison of prominent cost measure matrices.
    Goodarzi H; Najafabadi HS; Hassani K; Nejad HA; Torabi N
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Aug; 235(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 15882694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the optimality of the genetic code, with the consideration of termination codons.
    Goodarzi H; Nejad HA; Torabi N
    Biosystems; 2004 Nov; 77(1-3):163-73. PubMed ID: 15527955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimality in the standard genetic code is robust with respect to comparison code sets.
    Wichmann S; Ardern Z
    Biosystems; 2019 Nov; 185():104023. PubMed ID: 31520875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma.
    Koonin EV; Novozhilov AS
    IUBMB Life; 2009 Feb; 61(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 19117371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A computational screen for alternative genetic codes in over 250,000 genomes.
    Shulgina Y; Eddy SR
    Elife; 2021 Nov; 10():. PubMed ID: 34751130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Models of genetic code structure evolution with variable number of coded labels.
    Pawlak K; Wnetrzak M; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P; Błażej P
    Biosystems; 2021 Dec; 210():104528. PubMed ID: 34492316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robustness against point mutations of genetic code extensions under consideration of wobble-like effects.
    Fimmel E; Gumbel M; Starman M; Strüngmann L
    Biosystems; 2021 Oct; 208():104485. PubMed ID: 34280517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Codon usage bias and mutation constraints reduce the level of error minimization of the genetic code.
    Archetti M
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Aug; 59(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 15486699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The information capacity of the genetic code: Is the natural code optimal?
    Kuruoglu EE; Arndt PF
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Apr; 419():227-237. PubMed ID: 28163008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.