142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21340199)
1. [Recognition of speech in noise and relations with suppression of otoacoustic emissions and the acoustic reflex].
Lautenschlager L; Tochetto T; Costa MJ
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21340199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech-in-noise perception ability can be related to auditory efferent pathway function: a comparative study in reading impaired and normal reading children.
Akbari M; Panahi R; Valadbeigi A; Hamadi Nahrani M
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 30772249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Olivocochlear Efferent Activity Is Associated With the Slope of the Psychometric Function of Speech Recognition in Noise.
Mertes IB; Wilbanks EC; Leek MR
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 29135685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression findings in children with Asperger's Syndrome.
Kaf WA; Danesh AA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 77(6):947-54. PubMed ID: 23562236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Could the Use of Acoustic Reflexes Prior to Administering Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) Affect the Results of DPOAEs?
Garrette R; Jones AL; Wilson MW
Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):349-353. PubMed ID: 29800116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic immittance in children without otoacoustic emissions.
Linares AE; Carvallo RM
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2008; 74(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 18661016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of age on speech recognition in noise and on contralateral transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression.
Yilmaz ST; Sennaroğlu G; Sennaroğlu L; Köse SK
J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Nov; 121(11):1029-34. PubMed ID: 17381896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.
Uchida Y; Ando F; Shimokata H; Sugiura S; Ueda H; Nakashima T
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 18595184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
Sun XM
Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The time-course of the effects of contralateral sound on the level of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Sasaki N; Kawase T; Ogura M; Takasaka T
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2000 Jun; 191(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 10946916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occupational exposure to noise decreases otoacoustic emission efferent suppression.
Sliwinska-Kowalska M; Kotylo P
Int J Audiol; 2002 Mar; 41(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 12212856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of type 1 diabetes mellitus on efferent auditory system in children and adolescents.
Braite N; da Cruz Fernandes L; Rissatto Lago MR; de Aragão Dantas Alves C
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109660. PubMed ID: 31487561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationships among standard and wideband measures of middle ear function and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Schairer KS; Morrison B; Szewczyk E; Fowler CG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):253-64. PubMed ID: 21756841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss.
Shupak A; Tal D; Sharoni Z; Oren M; Ravid A; Pratt H
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 17721363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions with contralateral speech stimuli.
Timpe-Syverson GK; Decker TN
J Am Acad Audiol; 1999; 10(7):371-8. PubMed ID: 10949941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Middle Ear Muscle Reflex and Word Recognition in "Normal-Hearing" Adults: Evidence for Cochlear Synaptopathy?
Mepani AM; Kirk SA; Hancock KE; Bennett K; de Gruttola V; Liberman MC; Maison SF
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 31584501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
