These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Authorship and characteristics of articles in pharmacy journals: changes over a 20-year interval. Dotson B; McManus KP; Zhao JJ; Whittaker P Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Mar; 45(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 21325096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. An unbiased scientific record should be everyone's agenda. The PLoS Med; 2009 Feb; 6(2):e1000038. PubMed ID: 19243217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The role and responsibilities of coauthors. Lancet; 2008 Sep; 372(9641):778. PubMed ID: 18774402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. A retrospective analysis of 10-year authorship trends in biomedical engineering journals. Foo JY Account Res; 2011 Mar; 18(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 21390873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An ethicist's commentary on scientific authorship. Rollin BE Can Vet J; 2015 Aug; 56(8):794-5. PubMed ID: 26246625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Out of the way: how the next copyright revolution can help the next scientific revolution. Brown GO PLoS Biol; 2003 Oct; 1(1):E9. PubMed ID: 14551907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. On the quality of scientific publications and the responsibility of authors and reviewers. Hesse G Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Jul; 140(7):527. PubMed ID: 32108536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Publication ethics, national and international regulations]. Nielsen OH; Riis P Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Apr; 165(16):1646-8. PubMed ID: 12756818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Coauthorship in pathology, a comparison with physics and a survery-generated and member-preferred authorship guideline. Tarnow E; De Young BR; Cohen MB MedGenMed; 2004 Jul; 6(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 15520623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. On authorship in science: power, misconduct, responsibility and accountability. Datta S Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(3):184-188. PubMed ID: 35695868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A qualitative study of Equal Co-First Authorship. Hosseini M; Bruton SV Account Res; 2020 Nov; 27(8):496-520. PubMed ID: 32475162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Guidelines on good publication practice. Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE). Br J Biomed Sci; 2000; 57(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 10892026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The fruits of authorship. Juyal D; Thawani V; Thaledi S; Prakash A Educ Health (Abingdon); 2014; 27(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 25420989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Steen RG J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? Claxton LD Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15652224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Ethics and scientific publication. Benos DJ; Fabres J; Farmer J; Gutierrez JP; Hennessy K; Kosek D; Lee JH; Olteanu D; Russell T; Shaikh F; Wang K Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Jun; 29(2):59-74. PubMed ID: 15905149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail. Couzin J; Unger K Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Kwok LS J Med Ethics; 2005 Sep; 31(9):554-6. PubMed ID: 16131560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]