These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21340643)

  • 1. A novel technique for the management of advanced uterine/vault prolapse: extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy.
    Onol FF; Kaya E; Köse O; Onol SY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Jul; 22(7):855-61. PubMed ID: 21340643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effectiveness of abdominal minimal incision sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse].
    Shen WJ; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY; Wang QY; Schaffer SCHAFFER
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):328-334. PubMed ID: 34034419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
    Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Prospective multi-center study in "Xiehe" pelvic floor reconstruction surgery for severe pelvic organ prolapse].
    Sun ZJ; Zhu L; Lang JH; Hua KQ; Yang X; Han JS; Liang ZQ; Hu LN; Wang JL; Ma L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 46(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 22169511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall bilaterally using synthetic mesh to treat uterovaginal prolapse.
    Chen G; Ling B; Li J; Xu P; Hu W; Zhao W; Wu D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 20598651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Salamon CG; Lewis C; Priestley J; Gurshumov E; Culligan PJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1371-5. PubMed ID: 23296684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Re-treatments of recurrence after pelvic floor repair surgery].
    Fan SX; Wang FM; Lin LS; Song YF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):374-378. PubMed ID: 28647959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
    Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Gurshumov E; Lewis C; Priestley JL; Komar J; Shah N; Salamon CG
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Jun; 25(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 24264283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up.
    Rondini C; Braun H; Alvarez J; Urzúa MJ; Villegas R; Wenzel C; Descouvieres C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1131-8. PubMed ID: 25910610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can the PFDI (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory) or PFIQ (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaires) be used to predict outcome in pelvic reconstructive surgery?
    Letouzey V; Mercier G; Adjoussou S; Bohoussou E; Mares P; de Tayrac R
    Prog Urol; 2013 Sep; 23(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 24010925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.