165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21340686)
1. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in conization does not require immediate excisional procedure.
Campaner AB; Cardoso FA
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):517-9. PubMed ID: 21340686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia positive cutting edge after conization].
Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 29(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 17645859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions.
Simões RB; Campaner AB
APMIS; 2013 Dec; 121(12):1153-61. PubMed ID: 23607318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human papillomavirus combined with cytology and margin status identifies patients at risk for recurrence after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Ruano Y; Torrents M; Ferrer FJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2015; 36(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 26189247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization.
Chen JY; Wang ZL; Wang ZY; Yang XS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12792. PubMed ID: 30313104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of human papillomavirus testing after conization by loop electrosurgical excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Houfflin Debarge V; Collinet P; Vinatier D; Ego A; Dewilde A; Boman F; Leroy JL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Sep; 90(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 13678729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of the recurrence and residual lesions incidence after loop electroexcisional procedure and cold knife conisation].
Kabzińska-Turek M; Basta A; Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K; Knafel A; Zajac K; Przybylska-Jurecka P; Jach R; Milewicz T
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(9):658-62. PubMed ID: 23401984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Conization, frozen section examination, and planned hysterectomy in the treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Carvalho JP; Carvalho FM; Pincerato KM; Pereyra EA
Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo; 2001; 56(6):169-72. PubMed ID: 11836539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Milojkovic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disease persistence in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing electrosurgical conization.
Costa S; De Nuzzo M; Infante FE; Bonavita B; Marinelli M; Rubino A; Rambelli V; Santini D; Cristiani P; Bucchi L
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Apr; 85(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 11925130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
