165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21340686)
21. Long-term follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated with minimal conization by carbon dioxide laser.
Békássy Z
Lasers Surg Med; 1997; 20(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 9142687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 13-cis-retinoic acid for chemoprevention after colpoconization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Kim SH; Park TK; Kwon JY
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 May; 81(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 12706281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer.
Park JY; Lee SM; Yoo CW; Kang S; Park SY; Seo SS
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Radical conization of intraepithelial neoplasia].
Rothmann S; Mikkelsen M; Bor P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Apr; 176(8):. PubMed ID: 25096463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An electrical scalpel conization versus Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Kigure K; Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Nakao K; Hirakawa T; Rokukawa S; Ito M; Nishimura T; Ito I; Kagami I; Itoga S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12640. PubMed ID: 30313051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The value of endocervical curettage after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Schneider P; von Orelli S; Roos M; Leo C; Fink D; Wyss P
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 16(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 22115536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cold knife conization and loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Takac I; Gorisek B
Tumori; 1999; 85(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 10587025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Role of human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Huang HJ; Tung HJ; Yang LY; Chao A; Tang YH; Chou HH; Chang WY; Wu RC; Huang CC; Lin CY; Liao MJ; Chen WC; Lin CT; Chen MY; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Chang TC; Lai CH
Int J Cancer; 2021 Feb; 148(3):665-672. PubMed ID: 32781482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Needle excision of the transformation zone: A new method for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Sadek AL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 182(4):866-71. PubMed ID: 10764464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laser conization: the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Andersen ES; Pedersen B; Nielsen K
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8063246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long term outcomes of laser conization for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Thai women.
Wongtiraporn W; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Benjapibal M; Rattanachaiyanont M; Ruengkhachorn I; Chaopotong P; Laiwejpithaya S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7757-61. PubMed ID: 25292059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictors for recurrent/persistent high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cervical stenosis after therapeutic conization: a retrospective analysis of 522 cases.
Tanaka Y; Ueda Y; Kakuda M; Kubota S; Matsuzaki S; Iwamiya T; Okazawa A; Matsuzaki S; Hashimoto K; Kobayashi E; Mabuchi S; Sawada K; Tomimatsu T; Yoshino K; Kimura T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Oct; 22(5):921-926. PubMed ID: 28451844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability.
Matsumura M; Ota T; Takeshima N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 20683412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
