249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21341296)
1. Estimating and testing for center effects in competing risks.
Katsahian S; Boudreau C
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1608-17. PubMed ID: 21341296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysing multicentre competing risks data with a mixed proportional hazards model for the subdistribution.
Katsahian S; Resche-Rigon M; Chevret S; Porcher R
Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4267-78. PubMed ID: 16960919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cause-specific cumulative incidence estimation and the fine and gray model under both left truncation and right censoring.
Geskus RB
Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20377575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proportional subdistribution hazards modeling offers a summary analysis, even if misspecified.
Grambauer N; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):875-84. PubMed ID: 20213713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-dependent covariates in the proportional subdistribution hazards model for competing risks.
Beyersmann J; Schumacher M
Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):765-76. PubMed ID: 18434297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size calculations in the presence of competing risks.
Latouche A; Porcher R
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5370-80. PubMed ID: 17955563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local influence for the subdistribution of a competing risk.
Resche-Rigon M; Chevret S
Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(11):1937-47. PubMed ID: 16158402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduced-rank proportional hazards regression and simulation-based prediction for multi-state models.
Fiocco M; Putter H; van Houwelingen HC
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4340-58. PubMed ID: 18425994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Monte Carlo approach for change-point detection in the Cox proportional hazards model.
Liu M; Lu W; Shao Y
Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3894-909. PubMed ID: 18254131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Misspecified regression model for the subdistribution hazard of a competing risk.
Latouche A; Boisson V; Chevret S; Porcher R
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(5):965-74. PubMed ID: 16755533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced rank proportional hazards model for competing risks.
Fiocco M; Putter H; Van Houwelingen JC
Biostatistics; 2005 Jul; 6(3):465-78. PubMed ID: 15831577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis.
Beyersmann J; Latouche A; Buchholz A; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(6):956-71. PubMed ID: 19125387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variable selection in competing risks models based on quantile regression.
Li E; Tian M; Tang ML
Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4670-4685. PubMed ID: 31359443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regression modeling of competing risk using R: an in depth guide for clinicians.
Scrucca L; Santucci A; Aversa F
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2010 Sep; 45(9):1388-95. PubMed ID: 20062101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Second-order estimating equations for the analysis of clustered current status data.
Cook RJ; Tolusso D
Biostatistics; 2009 Oct; 10(4):756-72. PubMed ID: 19635760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modelling competing risks in cancer studies.
Klein JP
Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):1015-34. PubMed ID: 16435339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size formula for proportional hazards modelling of competing risks.
Latouche A; Porcher R; Chevret S
Stat Med; 2004 Nov; 23(21):3263-74. PubMed ID: 15490425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A competing risks analysis of bloodstream infection after stem-cell transplantation using subdistribution hazards and cause-specific hazards.
Beyersmann J; Dettenkofer M; Bertz H; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5360-9. PubMed ID: 17634974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic pseudo-observations: a robust approach to dynamic prediction in competing risks.
Nicolaie MA; van Houwelingen JC; de Witte TM; Putter H
Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):1043-52. PubMed ID: 23865523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
