These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21341356)

  • 1. Surgical technique enhances the efficiency of robotic hysterectomy.
    Feuer G; Hernandez P; Barker J
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Mar; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21341356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive surgical approaches to retrovesical structures.
    Passerotti C; Cendron M; Gargollo P; Diamond DA; Borer JG; Cilento B; Bauers S; Retik AB; Peters CA; Nguyen HT
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Dec; 3(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 18200625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
    Sert B; Abeler V
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted hysterectomy vs total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes.
    Göçmen A; Şanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Int J Med Robot; 2012 Dec; 8(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 23081780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Innovations in minimally invasive hysterectomy.
    Ridgeway B; Falcone T
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 57(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 24145361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic radical hysterectomy. A literature review.
    Smith AL; Pareja R; Ramirez PT
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 19745798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted laparoscopic trachelectomy after supracervical hysterectomy.
    Nezhat CH; Rogers JD
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):850.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18054926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.
    Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review.
    Krizova A; Clarke BA; Bernardini MQ; James S; Kalloger SE; Boerner SL; Mulligan AM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21164295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
    Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis.
    Nezhat C; Lewis M; Kotikela S; Veeraswamy A; Saadat L; Hajhosseini B; Nezhat C
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2758-60. PubMed ID: 20537632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique.
    Escobar PF; Fader AN; Paraiso MF; Kaouk JH; Falcone T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):589-91. PubMed ID: 19589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
    Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic foregut surgery.
    Ito F; Gould JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 17520645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pelosi minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a non-endoscopic minimally invasive alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Pelosi MA; Pelosi MA
    Surg Technol Int; 2004; 13():157-67. PubMed ID: 15744686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.