119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21342245)
1. Agreement and reasons for disagreement between photographic and hospital biomicroscopy grading of diabetic retinopathy.
Sallam A; Scanlon PH; Stratton IM; Jones V; Martin CN; Brelen M; Johnston RL
Diabet Med; 2011 Jun; 28(6):741-6. PubMed ID: 21342245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement between photographic screening and hospital biomicroscopy grading of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy.
Healy R; Sallam A; Jones V; Donachie PH; Scanlon PH; Stratton IM; Johnston RL
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(4):550-8. PubMed ID: 24338579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults.
Penman AD; Saaddine JB; Hegazy M; Sous ES; Ali MA; Brechner RJ; Herman WH; Engelgau MM; Klein R
Diabet Med; 1998 Sep; 15(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 9737809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of optometry vs digital photography screening for diabetic retinopathy in a single district.
Tu KL; Palimar P; Sen S; Mathew P; Khaleeli A
Eye (Lond); 2004 Jan; 18(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14707956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test.
Ong GL; Ripley LG; Newsom RS; Cooper M; Casswell AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15013866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Targeted mydriasis strategies for diabetic retinopathy screening clinics.
Dervan EW; O'Brien PD; Hobbs H; Acheson R; Flitcroft DI
Eye (Lond); 2010 Jul; 24(7):1207-12. PubMed ID: 20139914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy.
Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P
Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of screening for diabetic retinopathy by digital imaging photography and technician ophthalmoscopy.
Scanlon PH; Malhotra R; Thomas G; Foy C; Kirkpatrick JN; Lewis-Barned N; Harney B; Aldington SJ
Diabet Med; 2003 Jun; 20(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 12786681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy?
Murgatroyd H; Cox A; Ellingford A; Ellis JD; Macewen CJ; Leese GP
Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 17024219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?
Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW
Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective and accurate screening for diabetic retinopathy using a 60 degree mydriatic fundus camera.
Carmichael TR; Carp GI; Welsh ND; Kalk WJ
S Afr Med J; 2005 Jan; 95(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 15762251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photographic diabetic retinopathy screening in an urban family practice clinic: effect on compliance to eye examination.
Shah SU; Seibles J; Park SS
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(5):383-9. PubMed ID: 21688766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Krupinski EA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA
Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera.
Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Manoli P; Garcin AF; Millot L; Gavet Y; Estour B; Gain P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 140(5):814-821. PubMed ID: 16310458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Software for reading and grading diabetic retinopathy: Aravind Diabetic Retinopathy Screening 3.0.
Perumalsamy N; Prasad NM; Sathya S; Ramasamy K
Diabetes Care; 2007 Sep; 30(9):2302-6. PubMed ID: 17507695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
Wilson PJ; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Ellingford A; Talbot J; Leese GP
Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 20145421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
