151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21342566)
1. Ligand binding site superposition and comparison based on Atomic Property Fields: identification of distant homologues, convergent evolution and PDB-wide clustering of binding sites.
Totrov M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S35. PubMed ID: 21342566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PLIC: protein-ligand interaction clusters.
Anand P; Nagarajan D; Mukherjee S; Chandra N
Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014(0):bau029. PubMed ID: 24763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification of ligand molecules in PDB with graph match-based structural superposition.
Shionyu-Mitsuyama C; Hijikata A; Tsuji T; Shirai T
J Struct Funct Genomics; 2016 Dec; 17(4):135-146. PubMed ID: 28012138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PESDserv: a server for high-throughput comparison of protein binding site surfaces.
Das S; Krein MP; Breneman CM
Bioinformatics; 2010 Aug; 26(15):1913-4. PubMed ID: 20538727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Self-organizing fuzzy graphs for structure-based comparison of protein pockets.
Reisen F; Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
J Proteome Res; 2010 Dec; 9(12):6498-510. PubMed ID: 20883038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ligand binding site similarity identification based on chemical and geometric similarity.
Tu H; Shi T
Protein J; 2013 Jun; 32(5):373-85. PubMed ID: 23700221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. BioGPS: navigating biological space to predict polypharmacology, off-targeting, and selectivity.
Siragusa L; Cross S; Baroni M; Goracci L; Cruciani G
Proteins; 2015 Mar; 83(3):517-32. PubMed ID: 25556939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pocketome via comprehensive identification and classification of ligand binding envelopes.
An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2005 Jun; 4(6):752-61. PubMed ID: 15757999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PDB-Ligand: a ligand database based on PDB for the automated and customized classification of ligand-binding structures.
Shin JM; Cho DH
Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D238-41. PubMed ID: 15608186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. sc-PDB: an annotated database of druggable binding sites from the Protein Data Bank.
Kellenberger E; Muller P; Schalon C; Bret G; Foata N; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):717-27. PubMed ID: 16563002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Binding similarity network of ligand.
Park K; Kim D
Proteins; 2008 May; 71(2):960-71. PubMed ID: 18004762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of automatic ligand building in ARP/wARP.
Evrard GX; Langer GG; Perrakis A; Lamzin VS
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2007 Jan; 63(Pt 1):108-17. PubMed ID: 17164533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deciphering common recognition principles of nucleoside mono/di and tri-phosphates binding in diverse proteins via structural matching of their binding sites.
Bhagavat R; Srinivasan N; Chandra N
Proteins; 2017 Sep; 85(9):1699-1712. PubMed ID: 28547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Augmented Pocketome: Detection and Analysis of Small-Molecule Binding Pockets in Proteins of Known 3D Structure.
Bhagavat R; Sankar S; Srinivasan N; Chandra N
Structure; 2018 Mar; 26(3):499-512.e2. PubMed ID: 29514079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting ligand binding residues and functional sites using multipositional correlations with graph theoretic clustering and kernel CCA.
González AJ; Liao L; Wu CH
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(4):992-1001. PubMed ID: 22025754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From the similarity analysis of protein cavities to the functional classification of protein families using cavbase.
Kuhn D; Weskamp N; Schmitt S; Hüllermeier E; Klebe G
J Mol Biol; 2006 Jun; 359(4):1023-44. PubMed ID: 16697007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands and Proteins (FLAP): theory and application.
Baroni M; Cruciani G; Sciabola S; Perruccio F; Mason JS
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 17381166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
