311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21342775)
1. In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Dieringer MA; Greiser A; Schulz-Menger J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):736-42. PubMed ID: 21342775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Bohl S; Buschmann EE; Abdel-Aty H; Dietz R; Schulz-Menger J
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Schulz-Menger J
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Jun; 12(1):36. PubMed ID: 20573227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significant intra-valvular pressure loss across EPIC SUPRA and perimount magna supra-annular designed aortic bioprostheses in patients with normal aortic size.
Mohan JC; Mohan V; Shukla M; Sethi A
Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28228313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Hemodynamic Performance of Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in a Model of Oversizing.
Cleveland JD; Bowdish ME; Eberhardt CE; Mack WJ; Crabtree JA; Vassiliades TA; Speir AM; Darekar YA; Hackmann AE; Starnes VA; Cohen RG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Jun; 103(6):1866-1876. PubMed ID: 28131425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluid-dynamic results of in vitro comparison of four pericardial bioprostheses implanted in small porcine aortic roots.
Tasca G; Vismara R; Fiore GB; Mangini A; Romagnoni C; Pelenghi S; Antona C; Redaelli A; Gamba A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Feb; 47(2):e62-7. PubMed ID: 25414428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Four-dimensional flow MRI of stented versus stentless aortic valve bioprostheses.
van Kesteren F; Wollersheim LW; Baan J; Nederveen AJ; Kaya A; Boekholdt SM; de Mol BA; van Ooij P; Planken RN
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):257-264. PubMed ID: 28710578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comprehensive Fluid Dynamic and Geometric Study for an "In-Vitro" Comparison of Four Surgically Implanted Pericardial Stented Valves.
Tasca G; Vismara R; Fiore GB; Mangini A; Romagnoni C; Redaelli A; Antona C
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Sep; 24(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 26897839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aortic dilatation in patients with prosthetic aortic valve: comparison of MRI and echocardiography.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Abdel-Aty H; Schulz-Menger J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 20583398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) analysis of hemodynamics in valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis.
Oechtering TH; Hons CF; Sieren M; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Drexl J; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 152(2):418-427.e1. PubMed ID: 27423836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement--a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Trauzeddel RF; Barker AJ; Gruettner H; Markl M; Schulz-Menger J
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 170(3):426-33. PubMed ID: 24315151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study.
Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P
J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures.
Torii R; El-Hamamsy I; Donya M; Babu-Narayan SV; Ibrahim M; Kilner PJ; Mohiaddin RH; Xu XY; Yacoub MH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jun; 143(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 22361248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: an in vivo and in vitro study.
Bech-Hanssen O; Caidahl K; Wallentin I; Ask P; Wranne B
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 11479501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
