These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21342831)

  • 1. Insert earphone modeling and measurement by IEC-60711 coupler.
    Huang CH; Pawar S; Hong ZJ; Huang J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Feb; 58(2):461-9. PubMed ID: 21342831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of porous materials in an insert earphone on its frequency response--experiments and simulations.
    Tsai YT; Shiah YC; Huang JH
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Nov; 59(11):2537-47. PubMed ID: 23192818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro KJ; Salisbury VA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):408-13. PubMed ID: 12403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid coupler output level variability and coupler correction levels for insert earphones.
    Frank T; Richards WD
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 1916048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An initial investigation into the equivalence of the metal and plastic-cased TDH39 earphones.
    Canning DM
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Dec; 25(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 1773206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical use of an insert earphone.
    Clemis JD; Ballad WJ; Killion MC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):520-4. PubMed ID: 3767222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insert earphones--a comparison of short-duration signals measured with an occluded ear simulator and a 2cc coupler.
    Haughton P
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jan; 45(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16562566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental modeling and design optimization of push-pull electret loudspeakers.
    Bai MR; Wang CJ; Chiang DM; Lin SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2274-81. PubMed ID: 20370008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Equivalent circuit for broadband underwater transducers.
    Ramesh R; Ebenezer DD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2079-83. PubMed ID: 18986904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling electrical response of polymer-coated SAW resonators by equivalent circuit representation.
    Kshetrimayum R; Yadava RD; Tandon RP
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Jul; 51(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 21236460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation of piezoelectric excitation of guided waves using waveguide finite elements.
    Loveday PW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2038-45. PubMed ID: 18986900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problems with earphone calibration using a manikin.
    Ciechanowski JM; Cooper WA
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(3):88-94. PubMed ID: 1002584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalent circuit modeling of coupled resonator filters.
    de Paco P; Menendez O; Corrales E
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2030-7. PubMed ID: 18986899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultra-miniature coupled resonator filter with single-layer acoustic coupler.
    Jamneala T; Koelle UB; Shirakawa A; Gilbert SR; Nikkel P; Feng C; Ruby R
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2553-8. PubMed ID: 19942541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theoretical and experimental analysis of the electromechanical behavior of a compact spherical loudspeaker array for directivity control.
    Pasqual AM; Herzog P; Arruda JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3478-88. PubMed ID: 21218880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of measured acoustic power results gained by using three different methods on an ultrasonic low-frequency device.
    Petosić A; Svilar D; Ivancević B
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2011 Mar; 18(2):567-76. PubMed ID: 20850368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modified mason model for bulk acoustic wave resonators.
    Jamneala T; Bradley P; Koelle UB; Chien A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2025-9. PubMed ID: 18986898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thermoacoustic power conversion using a piezoelectric transducer.
    Jensen C; Raspet R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 20649205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling and experimental study on near-field acoustic levitation by flexural mode.
    Liu P; Li J; Ding H; Cao W
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Dec; 56(12):2679-85. PubMed ID: 20040404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.