363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21343404)
1. The sources and popularity of online drug information: an analysis of top search engine results and web page views.
Law MR; Mintzes B; Morgan SG
Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Mar; 45(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 21343404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Informational content of official pharmaceutical industry web sites about treatments for erectile dysfunction.
Waack KE; Ernst ME; Graber MA
Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Dec; 38(12):2029-34. PubMed ID: 15507499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving Web searches: case study of quit-smoking Web sites for teenagers.
Koo M; Skinner H
J Med Internet Res; 2003 Nov; 5(4):e28. PubMed ID: 14713656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the quality and accuracy of information regarding aromatase inhibitors available on the internet.
Beaton C; Codd RJ; Holland PA; Gateley CA
Breast J; 2008; 14(4):366-8. PubMed ID: 18537915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What do patients know about their low back pain? An analysis of the quality of information available on the Internet.
Galbusera F; Brayda-Bruno M; Freutel M; Seitz A; Steiner M; Wehrle E; Wilke HJ
Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 23187011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of information on the internet about a new device: the cervical artificial disc replacement.
Qureshi SA; Koehler SM; Lin JD; Bird J; Garcia RM; Hecht AC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):881-3. PubMed ID: 21912306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
Thompson AE; Graydon SL
J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability of patient spine education by Internet search engine.
Ghobrial GM; Mehdi A; Maltenfort M; Sharan AD; Harrop JS
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Mar; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 24529231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease.
Yeung TM; Mortensen NJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 22156872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Bailey MA; Coughlin PA; Sohrabi S; Griffin KJ; Rashid ST; Troxler MA; Scott DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 56(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22521801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.
Singh PM; Wight CA; Sercinoglu O; Wilson DC; Boytsov A; Raizada MN
J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e18. PubMed ID: 17613488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of world wide web resources for identifying medical information.
Johnson PT; Chen JK; Eng J; Makary MA; Fishman EK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18692758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician use of brand versus generic drug names in 1993-1994 and 2003-2004.
Kwo EC; Kamat P; Steinman MA
Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Mar; 43(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 19261956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of natural health products in treating osteoporosis: what is the quality of internet patient advice?
Whelan AM; Jurgens TM; Bowles SK; Doyle H
Ann Pharmacother; 2009 May; 43(5):899-907. PubMed ID: 19417114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing cancer treatment related information online: unintended retrieval of complementary and alternative medicine web sites.
Kim DY; Lee HR; Nam EM
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Jan; 18(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18771532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Internet audience measurement data to gauge market share for online health information services.
Wood FB; Benson D; LaCroix EM; Siegel ER; Fariss S
J Med Internet Res; 2005 Jul; 7(3):e31. PubMed ID: 15998622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality analysis of patient information about knee arthroscopy on the World Wide Web.
Sambandam SN; Ramasamy V; Priyanka P; Ilango B
Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):509-513.e2. PubMed ID: 17478282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How good is Google? The quality of otolaryngology information on the internet.
Pusz MD; Brietzke SE
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):462-5. PubMed ID: 22597577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hormone replacement therapy advertising: sense and nonsense on the web pages of the best-selling pharmaceuticals in Spain.
Chilet-Rosell E; MartÃn Llaguno M; Ruiz Cantero MT; Alonso-Coello P
BMC Public Health; 2010 Mar; 10():134. PubMed ID: 20233393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources.
Reavley NJ; Mackinnon AJ; Morgan AJ; Alvarez-Jimenez M; Hetrick SE; Killackey E; Nelson B; Purcell R; Yap MB; Jorm AF
Psychol Med; 2012 Aug; 42(8):1753-62. PubMed ID: 22166182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
