These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21343404)

  • 1. The sources and popularity of online drug information: an analysis of top search engine results and web page views.
    Law MR; Mintzes B; Morgan SG
    Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Mar; 45(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 21343404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informational content of official pharmaceutical industry web sites about treatments for erectile dysfunction.
    Waack KE; Ernst ME; Graber MA
    Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Dec; 38(12):2029-34. PubMed ID: 15507499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Web searches: case study of quit-smoking Web sites for teenagers.
    Koo M; Skinner H
    J Med Internet Res; 2003 Nov; 5(4):e28. PubMed ID: 14713656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the quality and accuracy of information regarding aromatase inhibitors available on the internet.
    Beaton C; Codd RJ; Holland PA; Gateley CA
    Breast J; 2008; 14(4):366-8. PubMed ID: 18537915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What do patients know about their low back pain? An analysis of the quality of information available on the Internet.
    Galbusera F; Brayda-Bruno M; Freutel M; Seitz A; Steiner M; Wehrle E; Wilke HJ
    Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 23187011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of information on the internet about a new device: the cervical artificial disc replacement.
    Qureshi SA; Koehler SM; Lin JD; Bird J; Garcia RM; Hecht AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):881-3. PubMed ID: 21912306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
    Thompson AE; Graydon SL
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability of patient spine education by Internet search engine.
    Ghobrial GM; Mehdi A; Maltenfort M; Sharan AD; Harrop JS
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Mar; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 24529231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease.
    Yeung TM; Mortensen NJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 22156872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bailey MA; Coughlin PA; Sohrabi S; Griffin KJ; Rashid ST; Troxler MA; Scott DJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 56(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22521801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.
    Singh PM; Wight CA; Sercinoglu O; Wilson DC; Boytsov A; Raizada MN
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e18. PubMed ID: 17613488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of world wide web resources for identifying medical information.
    Johnson PT; Chen JK; Eng J; Makary MA; Fishman EK
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18692758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physician use of brand versus generic drug names in 1993-1994 and 2003-2004.
    Kwo EC; Kamat P; Steinman MA
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Mar; 43(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 19261956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of natural health products in treating osteoporosis: what is the quality of internet patient advice?
    Whelan AM; Jurgens TM; Bowles SK; Doyle H
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 May; 43(5):899-907. PubMed ID: 19417114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing cancer treatment related information online: unintended retrieval of complementary and alternative medicine web sites.
    Kim DY; Lee HR; Nam EM
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Jan; 18(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18771532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Internet audience measurement data to gauge market share for online health information services.
    Wood FB; Benson D; LaCroix EM; Siegel ER; Fariss S
    J Med Internet Res; 2005 Jul; 7(3):e31. PubMed ID: 15998622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality analysis of patient information about knee arthroscopy on the World Wide Web.
    Sambandam SN; Ramasamy V; Priyanka P; Ilango B
    Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):509-513.e2. PubMed ID: 17478282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How good is Google? The quality of otolaryngology information on the internet.
    Pusz MD; Brietzke SE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):462-5. PubMed ID: 22597577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hormone replacement therapy advertising: sense and nonsense on the web pages of the best-selling pharmaceuticals in Spain.
    Chilet-Rosell E; Martín Llaguno M; Ruiz Cantero MT; Alonso-Coello P
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Mar; 10():134. PubMed ID: 20233393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources.
    Reavley NJ; Mackinnon AJ; Morgan AJ; Alvarez-Jimenez M; Hetrick SE; Killackey E; Nelson B; Purcell R; Yap MB; Jorm AF
    Psychol Med; 2012 Aug; 42(8):1753-62. PubMed ID: 22166182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.