417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21343520)
1. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Yoon JH; Kim MH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Kim MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):730-6. PubMed ID: 21343520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions.
Park CS; Kim SH; Jung NY; Choi JJ; Kang BJ; Jung HS
Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 23584596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation.
Dong Y; Zhou C; Zhou J; Yang Z; Zhang J; Zhan W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():157-161. PubMed ID: 29571790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.
Schaefer FK; Heer I; Schaefer PJ; Mundhenke C; Osterholz S; Order BM; Hofheinz N; Hedderich J; Heller M; Jonat W; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 19773141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement in Ultrasound BI-RADS Classification and Real-Time Elastography Tsukuba Score Assessment of Breast Lesions.
Schwab F; Redling K; Siebert M; Schötzau A; Schoenenberger CA; Zanetti-Dällenbach R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2622-2629. PubMed ID: 27503826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical application of qualitative assessment for breast masses in shear-wave elastography.
Gweon HM; Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e680-5. PubMed ID: 23988689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1519-27. PubMed ID: 23212276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver and intermethod variability in data interpretation of breast strain elastography in suspicious breast lesions.
Turnaoğlu H; Haberal KM; Arslan S; Yavuz Çolak M; Ulu Öztürk F; Uslu N
Turk J Med Sci; 2021 Apr; 51(2):547-554. PubMed ID: 32950046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of One- and Two-Region of Interest Strain Elastography Measurements in the Differential Diagnosis of Breast Masses.
Park HJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH; Ahn HS
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 21(4):431-441. PubMed ID: 32193891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation.
Kim S; Choi S; Choi Y; Kook SH; Park HJ; Chung EC
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1797-804. PubMed ID: 25253826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
