These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21343752)

  • 1. Uterine scar assessment: how should it be done before trial of labor after cesarean delivery?
    Spong CY; Queenan JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):521-522. PubMed ID: 21343752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.
    Jastrow N; Irion O; Roberge S; Bujold E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 117(6):1438. PubMed ID: 21606763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.
    Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 21343754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can third-trimester assessment of uterine scar in women with prior Cesarean section predict uterine rupture?
    Jastrow N; Vikhareva O; Gauthier RJ; Irion O; Boulvain M; Bujold E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 26483275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
    Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
    Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysterotomy Extension at Cesarean Delivery and Future Uterine Rupture.
    Wilkie G; Shipp TD; Little SE; Fadayomi A; Carusi DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 137(2):271-272. PubMed ID: 33416283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sonographic diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy at 16 weeks.
    Smith A; Ash A; Maxwell D
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2007 May; 35(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 17366559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can third-trimester assessment of uterine scar in women with prior Cesarean section predict uterine rupture?
    Gonser M; Schmeil I; Klee A; Zumdick C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 48(4):537-538. PubMed ID: 27704672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of echography in the management of labor in women with uterine scar after cesarean section].
    Belousov MA; Mareeva LS; Mel'nikov AP
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):49-50. PubMed ID: 1755493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery.
    Valentin L
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):285-95. PubMed ID: 23103207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean scar imaging and prediction of subsequent obstetric complications.
    Varner M
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 55(4):988-96. PubMed ID: 23090468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
    Hamar BD; Saber SB; Cackovic M; Magloire LK; Pettker CM; Abdel-Razeq SS; Rosenberg VA; Buhimschi IA; Buhimschi CS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 17906013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.
    Landon MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2010 Aug; 34(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 20654777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Uterine scar after caeserean section- predicting the risk of uterine rupture and decision on the way of delivery].
    Tzankova M; Nikolov A; Pirnareva E
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2014; 53(4):29-32. PubMed ID: 25510068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.
    Ryo E; Sakurai R; Kamata H; Seto M; Morita M; Ayabe T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 27033868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Spontaneous uterine rupture along the scar following cesarean section in the lower segment of the uterus].
    Prochorow M; Lazar W
    Ginekol Pol; 1972 Apr; 43(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 4666606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.
    Risager JK; Uldbjerg N; Glavind J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(2):389-394. PubMed ID: 31992102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
    Ceci O; Scioscia M; Bettocchi S; Cantatore C; Nardelli C; Laera A; Vimercati A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):452; author reply 452. PubMed ID: 18238987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.