These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21343752)

  • 21. Sonographic Findings and Diagnostic Pitfalls in Evaluation for Uterine Rupture in a Case of Fetal Demise and Prior Cesarean Delivery of Unknown Type.
    Spain JA; Shaikh S; Sandberg SA
    Ultrasound Q; 2017 Mar; 33(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 28081020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section with hysterotomy above the lower uterine segment.
    Dellino M; Crupano FM; He X; Malvasi A; Vimercati A
    Acta Biomed; 2022 Sep; 93(S1):e2022269. PubMed ID: 36129411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unintended lower-segment hysterotomy extension at cesarean delivery and the risk for uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor.
    Peled T; Ashwal E; Rotem R; Sela HY; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Rottenstreich M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Sep; 162(3):957-963. PubMed ID: 37074521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Echographic and morphological parallels in the evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar].
    Lebedev VA; Strizhakov AN; Zheleznov BI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):44-9. PubMed ID: 1755492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The cesarean section scar and subsequent labor. II. Criteria for subsequent vaginal delivery; risk factors for uterine rupture].
    Zábranský F
    Ceska Gynekol; 1994 Dec; 59(6):321-3. PubMed ID: 7834172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar.
    Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 28233347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Acceptability of repeated cesarean section uterine scar due to resection as a cause for the repeated cesarean section].
    Yamamura H; Yoshida S
    Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1967 Dec; 16(12):1093-101. PubMed ID: 5632117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Uterus rupture in the scar following cesarean section].
    Wiesiolek J; Lipiński A
    Wiad Lek; 1970 Nov; 23(21):1929-31. PubMed ID: 5485647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar before pregnancy and at 11-14 weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study.
    Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 50(1):105-109. PubMed ID: 27419374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New ultrasonographic risk assessment of uterine scar dehiscence in pregnancy after cesarean section.
    Kawakami K; Yoshizato T; Kurokawa Y; Okura N; Ushijima K
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 36536061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
    Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.
    Brahmalakshmy BL; Kushtagi P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):755-62. PubMed ID: 25209351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester.
    Timor-Tritsch IE; Monteagudo A; Cali G; El Refaey H; Kaelin Agten A; Arslan AA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):225.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26899908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar after cesarean section by echography].
    Titchenko LI; Belousov MA; Zhilenko MI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1990 Nov; (11):69-70. PubMed ID: 2077921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study.
    Barzilay E; Shay A; Lahav-Ezra H; Shina A; Perlman S; Achiron R; Gilboa Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jul; 31(14):1885-1888. PubMed ID: 28511577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scar Pregnancy a Diagnostic Conundrum: A Case Report.
    Pokhrel M; Acharya SP; Sharma J; Thapa M
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2021 Mar; 59(235):288-291. PubMed ID: 34506448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Uterine rupture along the scar following cesarean section].
    Verkhovskiĭ AL
    Vopr Okhr Materin Det; 1967 Jan; 12(1):64-5. PubMed ID: 5601164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gynecological and postpartum ultrasonography of cesarean uterine scar defects: a pictorial essay.
    El Agwany AS
    J Ultrasound; 2020 Dec; 23(4):613-619. PubMed ID: 31482293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section.
    Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Wolnicki B; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():391-395. PubMed ID: 33540191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.