These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21343755)

  • 1. Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA; Miller H; Parker L; Powers BL; Rayburn WF;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):533-541. PubMed ID: 21343755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA; Brown R; Plante LA; Miller H; Rugarn O; Powers BL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 122(2 Pt 1):201-209. PubMed ID: 23857539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes.
    Rankin K; Chodankar R; Raymond K; Bhaskar S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():93-96. PubMed ID: 30122321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
    McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
    Wallström T; Strandberg M; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Pilo C; Jarnbert-Pettersson H; Friman-Mathiasson M; Wiberg-Itzel E
    BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30989788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.
    Haas DM; Daggy J; Flannery KM; Dorr ML; Bonsack C; Bhamidipalli SS; Pierson RC; Lathrop A; Towns R; Ngo N; Head A; Morgan S; Quinney SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):259.e1-259.e16. PubMed ID: 31075246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study.
    Marsdal KE; Sørbye IK; Gaudernack LC; Lukasse M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29304769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 18827122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety of misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction using standard vs. adjusted retrieval criteria: a comparative cohort study.
    Brandstetter A; Döbert M; Schwaerzler P; Döbert TF; Hasselbeck H; Henrich W
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Jun; 48(5):488-494. PubMed ID: 32304314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol vaginal insert vs. oral misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Redling K; Schaedelin S; Huhn EA; Hoesli I
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Feb; 47(2):176-182. PubMed ID: 30179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Castañeda CS; Izquierdo Puente JC; Leon Ochoa RA; Plasse TF; Powers BL; Rayburn WF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. PubMed ID: 16157114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal heart rate and cardiotocographic abnormalities with varying dose misoprostol vaginal inserts.
    Stephenson ML; Powers BL; Wing DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 22712609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.