89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21343828)
1. Intent to update systematic reviews: results of an internet survey.
Phung OJ; Baker WL; Baker EL; Coleman CI
J Investig Med; 2011 Jun; 59(5):811-5. PubMed ID: 21343828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews.
Piehl JH; Green S; McDonald S
BMC Health Serv Res; 2003 Jan; 3(1):2. PubMed ID: 12533194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motivating authors to update systematic reviews: practical strategies from a behavioural science perspective.
Ervin AM
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1(0 1):33-7. PubMed ID: 18237350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.
Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
BMC Med; 2003 Nov; 1():2. PubMed ID: 14633274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When and how to update systematic reviews.
Moher D; Tsertsvadze A; Tricco AC; Eccles M; Grimshaw J; Sampson M; Barrowman N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; 2008(1):MR000023. PubMed ID: 18254126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Up-to-dateness of reviews is often neglected in overviews: a systematic review.
Pieper D; Antoine SL; Neugebauer EA; Eikermann M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1302-8. PubMed ID: 25281222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Updating systematic reviews: an international survey.
Garritty C; Tsertsvadze A; Tricco AC; Sampson M; Moher D
PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e9914. PubMed ID: 20376338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Neonatal neurology decision-making starting from systematic reviews of Cochrane Collaboration].
González de Dios J
Rev Neurol; 2005 Apr 16-30; 40(8):453-9. PubMed ID: 15861325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program.
Tsertsvadze A; Maglione M; Chou R; Garritty C; Coleman C; Lux L; Bass E; Balshem H; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1208-15. PubMed ID: 21684114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence.
Bashir R; Surian D; Dunn AG
Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):195. PubMed ID: 30447694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time to update and quantitative changes in the results of cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.
Jaidee W; Moher D; Laopaiboon M
PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11553. PubMed ID: 20644625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.
Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM
Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine.
Lane D; Dykeman J; Ferri M; Goldsmith CH; Stelfox HT
J Crit Care; 2013 Aug; 28(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 23312123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
