267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21344805)
1. Diagnostic performance of CT findings in differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis.
Suthikeeree W; Lertdomrongdej L; Charoensak A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93(12):1422-9. PubMed ID: 21344805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perforated and nonperforated appendicitis: defect in enhancing appendiceal wall--depiction with multi-detector row CT.
Tsuboi M; Takase K; Kaneda I; Ishibashi T; Yamada T; Kitami M; Higano S; Takahashi S
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 18096535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection.
Bixby SD; Lucey BC; Soto JA; Theysohn JM; Ozonoff A; Varghese JC
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):780-6. PubMed ID: 17114626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome.
Kim MS; Park HW; Park JY; Park HJ; Lee SY; Hong HP; Kwag HJ; Kwon HJ
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 24633221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT.
Horrow MM; White DS; Horrow JC
Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12615997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay.
Foley TA; Earnest F; Nathan MA; Hough DM; Schiller HJ; Hoskin TL
Radiology; 2005 Apr; 235(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 15749978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis with CT.
Yeung KW; Chang MS; Hsiao CP
Clin Imaging; 2004; 28(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 15531143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound for differentiation between perforated and nonperforated appendicitis in pediatric patients.
Blumfield E; Nayak G; Srinivasan R; Muranaka MT; Blitman NM; Blumfield A; Levin TL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):957-62. PubMed ID: 23617475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use and accuracy of computed tomography scan in diagnosing perforated appendicitis.
Verma R; Grechushkin V; Carter D; Barish M; Pryor A; Telem D
Am Surg; 2015 Apr; 81(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 25831188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The challenging ultrasound diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in children: constellations of sonographic findings improve specificity.
Tulin-Silver S; Babb J; Pinkney L; Strubel N; Lala S; Milla SS; Tomita S; Fefferman NR
Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jun; 45(6):820-30. PubMed ID: 25471754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis.
Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Rivadeneira DE; Grobmyer SR; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Surgery; 2000 Aug; 128(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 10922984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Perforation in Patients With Acute Appendicitis.
Gaskill CE; Simianu VV; Carnell J; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Flum DR; Davidson GH
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018; 47(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 28162864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis.
Oliak D; Sinow R; French S; Udani VM; Stamos MJ
Am Surg; 1999 Oct; 65(10):959-64. PubMed ID: 10515543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only.
Anderson SW; Soto JA; Lucey BC; Ozonoff A; Jordan JD; Ratevosian J; Ulrich AS; Rathlev NK; Mitchell PM; Rebholz C; Feldman JA; Rhea JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 19843742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acute Appendicitis: Use of Clinical and CT Findings for Modeling Hospital Resource Utilization.
Viradia NK; Gaing B; Kang SK; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W275-82. PubMed ID: 26295663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT.
Choi D; Park H; Lee YR; Kook SH; Kim SK; Kwag HJ; Chung EC
Acta Radiol; 2003 Nov; 44(6):574-82. PubMed ID: 14616200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiating perforated from non-perforated appendicitis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Rosenbaum DG; Askin G; Beneck DM; Kovanlikaya A
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Oct; 47(11):1483-1490. PubMed ID: 28578474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.
Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Macari M; Megibow AJ; Israel G; Maki DD; Aguiar AM; Langlotz CP
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 11526267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid to diagnose appendicitis with a 64-detector row CT scanner.
Moteki T; Ohya N; Horikoshi H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 22082540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging.
Wise SW; Labuski MR; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Meilstrup JW; Holley GP; LaRusso SA; Holliman J; Ruggiero FM; Mauger D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):933-41. PubMed ID: 11264081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
