272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21345000)
1. Provision of assistive technology services method (ATSM) according to evidence-based information and knowledge management.
Elsaesser LJ; Bauer SM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2011; 6(5):386-401. PubMed ID: 21345000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrating medical, assistive, and universal design products and technologies: Assistive Technology Service Method (ATSM).
Elsaesser LJ; Bauer S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Jul; 7(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 22188388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrating medical, assistive, and universally designed products and technologies: assistive technology device classification (ATDC).
Bauer S; Elsaesser LJ
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Sep; 7(5):350-5. PubMed ID: 22320260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assistive technology device classification based upon the World Health Organization's, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
Bauer SM; Elsaesser LJ; Arthanat S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2011; 6(3):243-59. PubMed ID: 21446850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of assistive technology service delivery models: stakeholder perspectives and preferences.
Ripat J; Booth A
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 27(24):1461-70. PubMed ID: 16421071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A survey of assistive technology service providers in the USA.
Arthanat S; Elsaesser LJ; Bauer S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):789-800. PubMed ID: 28125297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Realizing the potential of accessible ICTs in developing countries.
Samant D; Matter R; Harniss M
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Jan; 8(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 22480272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning.
Scherer MJ
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Jul; 27(13):731-9. PubMed ID: 16096225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What factors are associated with the provision of assistive technologies: the Bogotá D.C. case.
Rios A; Miguel Cruz A; GuarÃn MR; Caycedo Villarraga PS
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Sep; 9(5):432-44. PubMed ID: 25007129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical practice guidelines to improve shared decision-making about assistive device use in home care: a pilot intervention study.
Roelands M; Van Oost P; Stevens V; Depoorter A; Buysse A
Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Nov; 55(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15530763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current state of mobility technology provision in less-resourced countries.
Jefferds AN; Beyene NM; Upadhyay N; Shoker P; Pearlman JL; Cooper RA; Wee J
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2010 Feb; 21(1):221-42. PubMed ID: 19951788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Broadening opportunities for job seekers with disabilities: strategies to effectively provide assistive technology in One-Stop centers.
Timmons JC; Boeltzig H; Fesko SL; Cohen A; Hamner D
Work; 2007; 28(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 17264423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and quality criteria for improving assistive technology service delivery in Europe.
Steel EJ; Gelderblom GJ; de Witte LP
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 91(13 Suppl 1):S55-61. PubMed ID: 22193311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes.
Fuhrer MJ; Jutai JW; Scherer MJ; DeRuyter F
Disabil Rehabil; 2003 Nov; 25(22):1243-51. PubMed ID: 14617441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Policies concerning assistive technology and home modification services for people with physical and cognitive disabilities in Sweden.
Bartfai A; Boman IL
NeuroRehabilitation; 2011; 28(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 21558635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assistive technology funding in the United States.
Wallace J
NeuroRehabilitation; 2011; 28(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 21558634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assistive technology for disabled clients.
Bergen AF
Caring; 1998 Jan; 17(1):18-20, 22, 24-7. PubMed ID: 10176759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994.
Russell JN; Hendershot GE; LeClere F; Howie LJ; Adler M
Adv Data; 1997 Nov; (292):1-9. PubMed ID: 10182811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assistive technology outcomes in work settings.
Schwanke TD; Smith RO
Work; 2005; 24(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 15860909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
