These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21345428)

  • 1. When good evidence goes bad: the weak evidence effect in judgment and decision-making.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    Cognition; 2011 Jun; 119(3):459-67. PubMed ID: 21345428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feelings not forgone: underestimating affective reactions to what does not happen.
    Andrade EB; Van Boven L
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):706-11. PubMed ID: 20483850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing gains and losses.
    McGraw AP; Larsen JT; Kahneman D; Schkade D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1438-45. PubMed ID: 20739673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysiological anticipation of positive outcomes promotes advantageous decision-making in normal older persons.
    Denburg NL; Recknor EC; Bechara A; Tranel D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jul; 61(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16426691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.
    van 't Wout M; Sanfey AG
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 18721917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence of stochastic resonance in an auditory discrimination task may reflect response bias.
    Shepherd D; Hautus MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1931-40. PubMed ID: 19933574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grouping information for judgments.
    Shah AK; Oppenheimer DM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21299316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgment and decision making.
    Mellers BA; Schwartz A; Cooke AD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():447-77. PubMed ID: 9496629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generating and evaluating options for decision making: the impact of sequentially presented evidence.
    Sprenger A; Dougherty MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):550-75. PubMed ID: 22082233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative reference points and outcome evaluation: the influence of affect.
    Johnson MD; Ilies R; Boles TL
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Jan; 97(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 21842975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct risk aversion: evidence from risky prospects valued below their worst outcome.
    Simonsohn U
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):686-92. PubMed ID: 19422629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic.
    Hilbig BE; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1296-305. PubMed ID: 19686022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding.
    Fernbach PM; Rogers T; Fox CR; Sloman SA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):939-46. PubMed ID: 23620547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Belief inhibition during thinking: not always winning but at least taking part.
    De Neys W; Franssens S
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 19703685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Confirmatory information search in simultaneous vs. sequential information presentation].
    Jonas E; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 11486641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Focusing effects in predecisional information acquisition.
    Del Missier F; Ferrante D; Costantini E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):155-74. PubMed ID: 16919591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making sense of candidates: partisanship, ideology, and issues as guides to judgment.
    Huckfeldt R; Mondak JJ; Craw M; Mendez JM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 15795130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.
    Pronin E
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jan; 11(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17129749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 11873858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.