These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21345690)

  • 1. Conventional aortic valve replacement for high-risk aortic stenosis patients not suitable for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: feasibility and outcome.
    Dimarakis I; Rehman SM; Grant SW; Saravanan DM; Levy RD; Bridgewater B; Kadir I
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 21345690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional aortic valve replacement in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and previous coronary artery bypass grafting in the era of interventional approaches.
    Redlich K; Khaladj N; Peterss S; Pichlmaier M; Shrestha M; Hoy L; Haverich A; Hagl C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(2):455-62. PubMed ID: 21256760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural and late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Dewey TM; Brown DL; Herbert MA; Culica D; Smith CR; Leon MB; Svensson LG; Tuzcu M; Webb JG; Cribier A; Mack MJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Mar; 89(3):758-67; discussion 767. PubMed ID: 20172123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time.
    Gersak B; Sutlic Z
    Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting: 10-year experience.
    Vohra HA; Pousios D; Whistance RN; Haw MP; Barlow CW; Ohri SK; Livesey SA; Tsang GM
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Mar; 41(3):e1-6. PubMed ID: 22219478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation and conventional aortic valve replacement in octogenarians.
    Strauch JT; Scherner M; Haldenwang PL; Madershahian N; Pfister R; Kuhn EW; Liakopoulos OJ; Wippermann J; Wahlers T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 60(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 22547302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is transapical aortic valve implantation really less invasive than minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?
    Zierer A; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Martens S; Moritz A; Doss M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 19740493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EuroSCORE predicts short- and mid-term mortality in combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass patients.
    Kobayashi KJ; Williams JA; Nwakanma LU; Weiss ES; Gott VL; Baumgartner WA; Conte JV
    J Card Surg; 2009; 24(6):637-43. PubMed ID: 20078709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trans-apical and trans-axillary percutaneous aortic valve implantation as alternatives to the femoral route: short- and middle-term results.
    Taramasso M; Maisano F; Cioni M; Denti P; Godino C; Montorfano M; Colombo A; Alfieri O
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 21232969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aortic root enlargement does not increase the surgical risk and short-term patient outcome?
    Coutinho GF; Correia PM; Paupério G; de Oliveira F; Antunes MJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 21236693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thirty-day outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical valve replacement in patients with high-risk aortic stenosis: a matched comparison.
    Stöhr R; Dohmen G; Herpertz R; Brehmer K; Aktug O; Koos R; Altiok E; Stegemann E; Autschbach R; Marx N; Hoffmann R
    Coron Artery Dis; 2011 Dec; 22(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 22009042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in Iceland 2002-2006: Indications and short term complications].
    Ingvarsdóttir IL; Viktorsson SA; Hreinsson K; Sigurdsson MI; Helgadóttir S; Arnórsson P; Danielsen R; Gudbjartsson T
    Laeknabladid; 2011 Oct; 97(10):523-7. PubMed ID: 21998150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heart valve surgery in a very high-risk population: a preliminary experience in awake patients.
    Bottio T; Bisleri G; Piccoli P; Negri A; Manzato A; Muneretto C
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Mar; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17484469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients.
    Santarpino G; Pfeiffer S; Jessl J; Dell'Aquila AM; Pollari F; Pauschinger M; Fischlein T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):561-7. PubMed ID: 24280712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis assessing clinical effectiveness and safety.
    Fusari M; Bona V; Muratori M; Salvi L; Salis S; Tamborini G; Biglioli P
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2012 Apr; 13(4):229-41. PubMed ID: 22367569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Odell JA; Mullany CJ; Schaff HV; Orszulak TA; Daly RC; Morris JJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1424-30. PubMed ID: 8893579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence and treatment of procedural cardiovascular complications associated with trans-arterial and trans-apical interventional aortic valve implantation in 412 consecutive patients.
    Lange R; Bleiziffer S; Piazza N; Mazzitelli D; Hutter A; Tassani-Prell P; Laborde JC; Bauernschmitt R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Nov; 40(5):1105-13. PubMed ID: 21515069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alternative approaches for trans-catheter self-expanding aortic bioprosthetic valves implantation: single-center experience.
    Bruschi G; De Marco F; Fratto P; Oreglia J; Colombo P; Botta L; Klugmann S; Martinelli L
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):e151-8. PubMed ID: 21371900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =30% versus patients with ejection fraction >30%.
    Chikwe J; Croft LB; Goldstone AB; Castillo JG; Rahmanian PB; Adams DH; Filsoufi F
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):1717-21. PubMed ID: 19962482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do we increase the operative risk by adding the Cox Maze III procedure to aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery?
    Ad N; Henry L; Hunt S; Holmes SD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4):936-44. PubMed ID: 22244503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.