These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21345690)
1. Conventional aortic valve replacement for high-risk aortic stenosis patients not suitable for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: feasibility and outcome. Dimarakis I; Rehman SM; Grant SW; Saravanan DM; Levy RD; Bridgewater B; Kadir I Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 21345690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conventional aortic valve replacement in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and previous coronary artery bypass grafting in the era of interventional approaches. Redlich K; Khaladj N; Peterss S; Pichlmaier M; Shrestha M; Hoy L; Haverich A; Hagl C Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(2):455-62. PubMed ID: 21256760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural and late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Dewey TM; Brown DL; Herbert MA; Culica D; Smith CR; Leon MB; Svensson LG; Tuzcu M; Webb JG; Cribier A; Mack MJ Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Mar; 89(3):758-67; discussion 767. PubMed ID: 20172123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time. Gersak B; Sutlic Z Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence and treatment of procedural cardiovascular complications associated with trans-arterial and trans-apical interventional aortic valve implantation in 412 consecutive patients. Lange R; Bleiziffer S; Piazza N; Mazzitelli D; Hutter A; Tassani-Prell P; Laborde JC; Bauernschmitt R Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Nov; 40(5):1105-13. PubMed ID: 21515069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative approaches for trans-catheter self-expanding aortic bioprosthetic valves implantation: single-center experience. Bruschi G; De Marco F; Fratto P; Oreglia J; Colombo P; Botta L; Klugmann S; Martinelli L Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):e151-8. PubMed ID: 21371900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =30% versus patients with ejection fraction >30%. Chikwe J; Croft LB; Goldstone AB; Castillo JG; Rahmanian PB; Adams DH; Filsoufi F Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):1717-21. PubMed ID: 19962482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do we increase the operative risk by adding the Cox Maze III procedure to aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery? Ad N; Henry L; Hunt S; Holmes SD J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4):936-44. PubMed ID: 22244503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]