246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21346050)
1. Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays.
Binnicker MJ; Jespersen DJ; Rollins LO
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Apr; 49(4):1313-7. PubMed ID: 21346050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 syphilis multiplex flow immunoassay for the detection of IgM- and IgG-class antitreponemal antibodies.
Gomez E; Jespersen DJ; Harring JA; Binnicker MJ
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):966-8. PubMed ID: 20427627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement of reverse sequence algorithm for syphilis diagnosis using optimal treponemal screening assay signal-to-cutoff ratio.
Serhir B; Labbé AC; Doualla-Bell F; Simard M; Lambert G; Trudelle A; Longtin J; Tremblay C; Fortin C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204001. PubMed ID: 30212544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: comparison of the Trep-Chek IgG enzyme immunoassay with other screening and confirmatory tests.
Tsang RS; Martin IE; Lau A; Sawatzky P
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 51(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 17854473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing three treponemal tests for syphilis screening.
Buono SA; Godwin HA; Green NM
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2017 Nov; 89(3):173-177. PubMed ID: 28844341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.
Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a combined nontreponemal (VDRL) and treponemal immunoblot to traditional nontreponemal and treponemal assays.
Franken AA; Oliver JH; Litwin CM
J Clin Lab Anal; 2015 Jan; 29(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 24390867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a Multiplex Fully Automated Treponemal and Nontreponemal (Rapid Plasma Reagin) Assay.
Arbefeville S; Lynch M; Ferrieri P
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jul; 152(2):230-236. PubMed ID: 31139835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection.
Gratzer B; Pohl D; Hotton AL
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 May; 41(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 24722379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of different confirmatory algorithms using seven treponemal tests on Architect Syphilis TP-positive/RPR-negative sera.
Jonckheere S; Berth M; Van Esbroeck M; Blomme S; Lagrou K; Padalko E
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2041-8. PubMed ID: 26187433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay-negative sera following screening by treponemal total antibody enzyme immunoassays.
Maple PA; Ratcliffe D; Smit E
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1718-22. PubMed ID: 20844087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-country comparative study of two treponemal tests for the serodiagnosis of syphilis amongst men who have sex with men (MSM): Chemo-luminescent assay vs Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay.
Gios L; Mirandola M; Cordioli M; Zorzi A; Sherriff N; Vera J; Wlazly D; Hassan-Ibrahim MO; Padovese V; Anabel Darmanin ; Peeling RW; Unemo M; Blondeel K; Toskin I
BMC Infect Dis; 2024 Mar; 24(Suppl 1):313. PubMed ID: 38486194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis total screen (IgG/IgM) with reflex to an automated rapid plasma reagin test.
Rourk AR; Litwin CM
J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Jun; 33(5):e22878. PubMed ID: 30861169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Lumipulse G TP-N Chemiluminescent Immunoassay as a Syphilis Screening Test.
Ortiz DA; Loeffelholz MJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Nov; 55(11):3236-3241. PubMed ID: 28878003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an IgM/IgG sensitive enzyme immunoassay and the utility of index values for the screening of syphilis infection in a high-risk population.
Wong EH; Klausner JD; Caguin-Grygiel G; Madayag C; Barber KO; Qiu JS; Liska S; Pandori MW
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 21233789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of Treponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.
Park IU; Fakile YF; Chow JM; Gustafson KJ; Jost H; Schapiro JM; Novak-Weekley S; Tran A; Nomura JH; Chen V; Beheshti M; Tsai T; Hoover K; Bolan G
Clin Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 68(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29986091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the analytical level of agreement of nine treponemal assays for syphilis and possible implications for screening algorithms.
Jost H; Castro A; Cox D; Fakile Y; Kikkert S; Tun Y; Zaidi A; Park M
BMJ Open; 2013 Sep; 3(9):e003347. PubMed ID: 24056483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical comparison of the Treponema pallidum CAPTIA syphilis-G enzyme immunoassay with the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption immunoglobulin G assay for syphilis testing.
Halling VW; Jones MF; Bestrom JE; Wold AD; Rosenblatt JE; Smith TF; Cockerill FR
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Oct; 37(10):3233-4. PubMed ID: 10488183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Feb; 60(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 21307823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test for detection of antibodies (immunoglobulins G and M) to Treponema pallidum in serologic diagnosis of syphilis.
Aktas G; Young H; Moyes A; Badur S
Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Apr; 18(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 17509177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
