These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21346319)

  • 21. [Management of vaginal vault prolapse repair with robotically-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy].
    Elliott DS; Chow GK
    Ann Urol (Paris); 2007 Feb; 41(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17338498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Awad N; Mustafa S; Amit A; Deutsch M; Eldor-Itskovitz J; Lowenstein L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 23274792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
    Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mid term outcome of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.
    Belsante M; Murray S; Dillon B; Zimmern P
    Can J Urol; 2013 Feb; 20(1):6656-61. PubMed ID: 23433141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
    Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.
    Paraiso MF
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review.
    Ganatra AM; Rozet F; Sanchez-Salas R; Barret E; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Vallancien G
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1089-103. PubMed ID: 19201521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparoscopic promontofixation for pelvic organ prolapse: a 10-year single center experience in a series of 501 patients.
    Bacle J; Papatsoris AG; Bigot P; Azzouzi AR; Brychaet PE; Piussan J; Mandron E
    Int J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):821-6. PubMed ID: 21917023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robot-assisted laparoscopic presacral neurectomy: feasibility, techniques, and operative outcomes.
    Nezhat C; Morozov V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 20621011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Supracervical robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Benson AD; Kramer BA; Wayment RO; Schwartz BF
    JSLS; 2010; 14(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 21605516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Review of extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy as a technique for advanced uterine and vault prolapse.
    Onol FF; Onol SY
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 24(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 22614674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medium-term anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy beyond the learning curve.
    Claerhout F; De Ridder D; Roovers JP; Rommens H; Spelzini F; Vandenbroucke V; Coremans G; Deprest J
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1459-67. PubMed ID: 19111382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mid-term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior polyester mesh for treatment of genito-urinary prolapse.
    Sergent F; Resch B; Loisel C; Bisson V; Schaal JP; Marpeau L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 21353736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic/Laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: a urology perspective.
    Burgess KL; Elliott DS
    Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 22877718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.