200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21347419)
1. Accuracy and reproducibility of voxel based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography models on the anterior cranial base and the zygomatic arches.
Nada RM; Maal TJ; Breuning KH; Bergé SJ; Mostafa YA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16520. PubMed ID: 21347419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision and reliability of Dolphin 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition.
Bazina M; Cevidanes L; Ruellas A; Valiathan M; Quereshy F; Syed A; Wu R; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 29602352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.
Gkantidis N; Schauseil M; Pazera P; Zorkun B; Katsaros C; Ludwig B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118810. PubMed ID: 25706151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of voxel- and surface-based cone-beam computed tomography mandibular superimposition in adult orthodontic patients.
Han G; Li J; Wang S; Wang L; Zhou Y; Liu Y
J Int Med Res; 2021 Jan; 49(1):300060520982708. PubMed ID: 33459090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation.
Weissheimer A; Menezes LM; Koerich L; Pham J; Cevidanes LH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1188-96. PubMed ID: 25935632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. kVp, mA, and voxel size effect on 3D voxel-based superimposition.
Eliliwi M; Bazina M; Palomo JM
Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 31549857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients.
Cevidanes LH; Heymann G; Cornelis MA; DeClerck HJ; Tulloch JF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 19577154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study.
Koerich L; Burns D; Weissheimer A; Claus JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 26794399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term evaluation of soft-tissue changes after miniscrew-assisted and conventional rapid palatal expansion using voxel-based superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Mehta S; Vishwanath M; Patel A; Vich ML; Allareddy V; Yadav S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Mar; 165(3):332-343. PubMed ID: 38032552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE): three-dimensional superimposition on cranial base.
Romano F; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE; Saraiva MCP; Nguyen TT
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):3885-3897. PubMed ID: 35013784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid 3D mandibular superimposition for growing patients.
Koerich L; Weissheimer A; de Menezes LM; Lindauer SJ
Angle Orthod; 2017 May; 87(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 27767348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How accurate are the fusion of cone-beam CT and 3-D stereophotographic images?
Jayaratne YS; McGrath CP; Zwahlen RA
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49585. PubMed ID: 23185372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.
Ruellas AC; Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; Gomes MR; Danesi C; Lione R; Nguyen T; McNamara JA; Cozza P; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 27021458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial CBCTs: Reliability, reproducibility and segmentation effect on hard-tissue outcomes.
Häner ST; Kanavakis G; Matthey F; Gkantidis N
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 31529585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A deep learning-based automatic segmentation of zygomatic bones from cone-beam computed tomography images: A proof of concept.
Tao B; Yu X; Wang W; Wang H; Chen X; Wang F; Wu Y
J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104582. PubMed ID: 37321334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
