77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21347916)
1. Remedy for fictive negative pressures in biphasic finite element models of the intervertebral disc during unloading.
Schmidt H; Galbusera F; Wilke HJ; Shirazi-Adl A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Mar; 14(3):293-303. PubMed ID: 21347916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of tissue engineered intervertebral discs under complex loads.
Yao J; Turteltaub SR; Ducheyne P
Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(3):377-87. PubMed ID: 16168476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response analysis of the lumbar spine during regular daily activities--a finite element analysis.
Schmidt H; Shirazi-Adl A; Galbusera F; Wilke HJ
J Biomech; 2010 Jul; 43(10):1849-56. PubMed ID: 20394933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical influence of disk properties on the load transfer of healthy and degenerated disks using a poroelastic finite element model.
Chagnon A; Aubin CE; Villemure I
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Nov; 132(11):111006. PubMed ID: 21034147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Biomechanical analysis of artificial intervertebral disc in a 3-dimensional finite-element model].
Ge L; Li KH
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Nov; 33(11):1041-6. PubMed ID: 19060373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical factorial analysis on the poroelastic material properties sensitivity of the lumbar intervertebral disc under compression, flexion and axial rotation.
Malandrino A; Planell JA; Lacroix D
J Biomech; 2009 Dec; 42(16):2780-8. PubMed ID: 19796766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles.
Goel VK; Kong W; Han JS; Weinstein JN; Gilbertson LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1531-41. PubMed ID: 8235826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of inhomogeneous rather than homogeneous poroelastic tissue material properties within disc annulus and nucleus better predicts cervical spine response: a C3-T1 finite element model analysis under compression and moment loadings.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(4):E245-55. PubMed ID: 21270714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A meta-model analysis of a finite element simulation for defining poroelastic properties of intervertebral discs.
Nikkhoo M; Hsu YC; Haghpanahi M; Parnianpour M; Wang JL
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jun; 227(6):672-82. PubMed ID: 23636748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of four methods to simulate swelling in poroelastic finite element models of intervertebral discs.
Galbusera F; Schmidt H; Noailly J; Malandrino A; Lacroix D; Wilke HJ; Shirazi-Adl A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 21783132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress distribution in the intervertebral disc correlates with strength distribution in subdiscal trabecular bone in the porcine lumbar spine.
Ryan G; Pandit A; Apatsidis D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Aug; 23(7):859-69. PubMed ID: 18423954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stochastic finite element analysis of biological systems: comparison of a simple intervertebral disc model with experimental results.
Espino DM; Meakin JR; Hukins DW; Reid JE
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Aug; 6(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 12959758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study.
Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical response of a lumbar intervertebral disc to manual lifting activities: a poroelastic finite element model study.
Natarajan RN; Lavender SA; An HA; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):1958-65. PubMed ID: 18708928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core.
Moumene M; Geisler FH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1840-51. PubMed ID: 17762291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental and model determination of human intervertebral disc osmoviscoelasticity.
Schroeder Y; Elliott DM; Wilson W; Baaijens FP; Huyghe JM
J Orthop Res; 2008 Aug; 26(8):1141-6. PubMed ID: 18327799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading.
Schmidt H; Kettler A; Heuer F; Simon U; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 17414908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
