99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2134820)
1. [Cytotoxic effects of restorative materials on early passage cultured cells derived from human gingiva (in vitro)].
Yamagata N; Oshima H
Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Jul; 9(4):541-54. PubMed ID: 2134820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytotoxicity evaluation of perforation repair materials on human periodontal ligament cells in vitro.
Tai KW; Chang YC
J Endod; 2000 Jul; 26(7):395-7. PubMed ID: 11199763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cytotoxic and oxidative effects of restorative materials in cultured human gingival fibroblasts.
Celik N; Binnetoglu D; Ozakar Ilday N; Hacimuftuoglu A; Seven N
Drug Chem Toxicol; 2021 Sep; 44(5):502-507. PubMed ID: 31146597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quantitative evaluation by measuring affected area for cytotoxicity of dental materials].
Kaga M; Ito Y; Okabe T; Oguchi H; Ota M
Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Jul; 9(4):591-9. PubMed ID: 2134824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytotoxicity of dental composite (co)monomers and the amalgam component Hg(2+) in human gingival fibroblasts.
Reichl FX; Simon S; Esters M; Seiss M; Kehe K; Kleinsasser N; Hickel R
Arch Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 80(8):465-72. PubMed ID: 16474958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytotoxicity of root perforation repair materials.
Makkawy HA; Koka S; Lavin MT; Ewoldsen NO
J Endod; 1998 Jul; 24(7):477-9. PubMed ID: 9693574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of orthodontic bonding adhesives upon a primary human oral gingival fibroblast culture and a permanent, human oral cancer-cell line.
Huang TH; Tsai CY; Chen SL; Kao CT
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(6):814-21. PubMed ID: 12418029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytotoxicity of a calcium aluminate cement in comparison with other dental cements and resin-based materials.
Franz A; Konradsson K; König F; Van Dijken JW; Schedle A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Feb; 64(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 16428175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cements using mouse lymphoma cells in vitro.
Ribeiro DA; Marques ME; Salvadori DM
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):912-7. PubMed ID: 17168933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro assessment of cytotoxicity of resin-based dental restorative materials on WEHI 13 var fibroblasts.
Bakopoulou AA; Triviai IN; Tsiftsoglou AS; Garefis PD
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 16479751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Weight change of various light-cured restorative materials after water immersion.
Iwami Y; Yamamoto H; Sato W; Kawai K; Torii M; Ebisu S
Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 9656924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antimicrobial properties of glass-ionomer cements and other restorative materials.
Scherer W; Lippman N; Kaim J
Oper Dent; 1989; 14(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 2628947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative biological testing of Ketac-Bond glass ionomer cement].
Beer R; Gängler P; Wutzler P; Krehan F
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Apr; 45(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 2257828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glass ionomer and composite resin cements: effects on oral cells.
Caughman WF; Caughman GB; Dominy WT; Schuster GS
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 2338664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of etchant and cement age on the adhesion of resin composite to conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
Brackett WW; Huget EF
Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 9063213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
