166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21348895)
1. A new method for the visualization and quantification of internal skin elasticity by ultrasound imaging.
Osanai O; Ohtsuka M; Hotta M; Kitaharai T; Takema Y
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 21348895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relative contributions of different skin layers to the mechanical behavior of human skin in vivo using suction experiments.
Hendriks FM; Brokken D; Oomens CW; Bader DL; Baaijens FP
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 16099191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of elastic parameters of human skin using dynamic elastography.
Gennisson JL; Baldeweck T; Tanter M; Catheline S; Fink M; Sandrin L; Cornillon C; Querleux B
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Aug; 51(8):980-9. PubMed ID: 15346586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical properties of human skin in vivo: a comparative evaluation in 300 men and women.
Luebberding S; Krueger N; Kerscher M
Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 23889488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of skin elasticity test results from the Ballistometer(®) and Cutometer(®).
Woo MS; Moon KJ; Jung HY; Park SR; Moon TK; Kim NS; Lee BC
Skin Res Technol; 2014 Nov; 20(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 24506419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-Resolution Elastography for Thin-Layer Mechanical Characterization: Toward Skin Investigation.
Chartier C; Mofid Y; Bastard C; Miette V; Maruani A; Machet L; Ossant F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):670-681. PubMed ID: 28043724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of hydration and experimental length scale on the mechanical response of human skin in vivo, using optical coherence tomography.
Hendriks FM; Brokken D; Oomens CW; Baaijens FP
Skin Res Technol; 2004 Nov; 10(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 15479446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vivo imaging of skin under stress: potential of high-frequency (20 MHz) static 2-D elastography.
Mofid Y; Ossant F; Imberdis C; Josse G; Patat F
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 May; 53(5):925-35. PubMed ID: 16764447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with virtual touch tissue quantification: measurements of normal breast tissue and dependence on the degree of pre-compression.
Wojcinski S; Brandhorst K; Sadigh G; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2226-32. PubMed ID: 24035624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shear-wave elastographic features of breast cancers: comparison with mechanical elasticity and histopathologic characteristics.
Lee SH; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM; Moon HG; Han W; Noh DY; Lee JC; Kim HC; Lee KB; Park IA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 24169069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel method to obtain modulus image of soft tissues using ultrasound water jet indentation: a phantom study.
Lu MH; Zheng YP; Huang QH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17260862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of Cutometer area parameters for the study of human skin fatigue.
Dobrev H
Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 15807810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a novel method to measure the elastic properties of skin including subcutaneous tissue: new age-related parameters and scope of application.
Fujimura T; Osanai O; Moriwaki S; Akazaki S; Takema Y
Skin Res Technol; 2008 Nov; 14(4):504-11. PubMed ID: 18937789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of the skin-liver capsule distance on ultrasound RF data for 1D transient elastography.
Audière S; Charbit M; Angelini ED; Oudry J; Sandrin L
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20879296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel deformation method for fast simulation of biological tissue formed by fibers and fluid.
Costa IF
Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):1038-46. PubMed ID: 22584040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo measurement of breast skin elasticity and breast skin thickness.
Sutradhar A; Miller MJ
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e191-9. PubMed ID: 22891621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Study of ultrasound stiffness imaging methods using tissue mimicking phantoms.
Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):621-31. PubMed ID: 24083832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated Compression Device for Viscoelasticity Imaging.
Nabavizadeh A; Kinnick RR; Bayat M; Amador C; Urban MW; Alizad A; Fatemi M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jul; 64(7):1535-1546. PubMed ID: 28113299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real-time tissue elastography assessment of skin and subcutaneous tissue strains in legs with lymphedema.
Suehiro K; Nakamura K; Morikage N; Murakami M; Yamashita O; Ueda K; Samura M; Hamano K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2014 Jul; 41(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 27277911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a Soft Tissue Elastography Robotic Arm (STiERA).
Dargar S; Akyildiz AC; De S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():77-83. PubMed ID: 27046557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
