91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21348913)
1. Comparison of radiographical imaging modalities for measuring the diameter of renal masses: is there a sizeable difference?
Mucksavage P; Kutikov A; Magerfleisch L; Van Arsdalen K; Wein AJ; Ramchandani P; Malkowicz SB
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E232-6. PubMed ID: 21348913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is ultrasound imaging inferior to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating renal mass size?
Mucksavage P; Ramchandani P; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 22202542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Renal mass size: concordance between pathology and radiology.
Kathrins M; Caesar S; Mucksavage P; Guzzo T
Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Sep; 23(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 23778129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Discrepancy between radiological and pathological sizes of renal masses].
Huang JW; Dong BJ; Zhang J; Kong W; Xue W; Liu DM; Huang YR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 35(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 24119902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in Renal Tumor Size Measurements for Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for Patients on Active Surveillance.
Khan I; Beksac AT; Paulucci DJ; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Badani KK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1275-1278. PubMed ID: 28799884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Renal tumour size measured radiologically before surgery is an unreliable variable for predicting histopathological features: benign tumours are not necessarily small.
Remzi M; Katzenbeisser D; Waldert M; Klingler HC; Susani M; Memarsadeghi M; Heinz-Peer G; Haitel A; Herwig R; Marberger M
BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5):1002-6. PubMed ID: 17437434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-tumor Doppler flow patterns do not predict malignancy of renal masses in a United States population.
Hsiao W; Shrewsberry AB; Moses KA; Malek-Jones M; Baumgarten D; Master VA; Ogan K
Can J Urol; 2011 Aug; 18(4):5831-5. PubMed ID: 21854716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional tumour volume and cancer-specific survival for patients undergoing nephrectomy to treat pT1 clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
Jorns J; Thiel DD; Lohse CM; Williams A; Arnold ML; Cheville JC; Leibovich BC; Parker AS
BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(7):956-60. PubMed ID: 22300498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Partial elective nephrectomy].
Zungri E; Martínez L; Leal D; Lorenzo L
Actas Urol Esp; 2012 Mar; 36(3):160-4. PubMed ID: 21955560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative predictors of surgical approach for partial nephrectomy.
Raman JD; Smith B; Messer J; Rohner TJ; Harpster LE; Reese CT
Can J Urol; 2011 Oct; 18(5):5896-902. PubMed ID: 22018152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of radiographic renal cell carcinoma tumor volume utilizing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging compared with pathological tumor volume.
Jorns J; Thiel DD; Arnold ML; Diehl N; Cernigliaro JC; Wu KJ; Parker AS
Scand J Urol; 2014 Oct; 48(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 24990768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small tumour size is associated with new-onset chronic kidney disease after radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Jeon HG; Choo SH; Sung HH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 24060356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contemporary imaging of patients with a renal mass: does size on computed tomography equal pathological size?
Kurta JM; Thompson RH; Kundu S; Kaag M; Manion MT; Herr HW; Russo P
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 18710440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal tumor contact surface area: a novel parameter for predicting complexity and outcomes of partial nephrectomy.
Leslie S; Gill IS; de Castro Abreu AL; Rahmanuddin S; Gill KS; Nguyen M; Berger AK; Goh AC; Cai J; Duddalwar VA; Aron M; Desai MM
Eur Urol; 2014 Nov; 66(5):884-93. PubMed ID: 24680360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Growth kinetics of renal masses: analysis of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing active surveillance.
Mason RJ; Abdolell M; Trottier G; Pringle C; Lawen JG; Bell DG; Jewett MA; Klotz L; Rendon RA
Eur Urol; 2011 May; 59(5):863-7. PubMed ID: 21353376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can we avoid surgery in elderly patients with renal masses by using the Charlson comorbidity index?
O'Connor KM; Davis N; Lennon GM; Quinlan DM; Mulvin DW
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(11):1492-5. PubMed ID: 19076135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pre-operative imaging may overestimate the kidney tumor size.
Nasseh HR; Falahatkar S; Ghanbari A; Bagheri Chenari H
Urol J; 2012; 9(4):662-6. PubMed ID: 23235970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed tomography based renal parenchyma volume measurements prior to renal tumor surgery are predictive of postoperative renal function.
Kunzel B; Small W; Goodman M; Pattaras J; Master V; Ogan K
Can J Urol; 2013 Apr; 20(2):6714-20. PubMed ID: 23587512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Ipsilateral adrenalectomy in the surgical treatment of renal carcinoma].
Marois C; Bedard G; Charrois R; Fradet Y; Naud A; Gregoire M
Prog Urol; 1995 Dec; 5(6):961-4. PubMed ID: 8777404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Added value of abdominal cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) in staging of Wilms' tumours.
McDonald K; Duffy P; Chowdhury T; McHugh K
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 22892244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
