209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21349013)
1. Balancing treatment allocations by clinician or center in randomized trials allows unacceptable levels of treatment prediction.
Hills RK; Gray R; Wheatley K
J Evid Based Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 21349013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.
Perry M; Faes M; Reelick MF; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1118-22. PubMed ID: 20304606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.
Dupin-Spriet T; Fermanian J; Spriet A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1269-76. PubMed ID: 16291471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reverse propensity score to detect selection bias and correct for baseline imbalances.
Berger VW
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2777-87. PubMed ID: 15981305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 21320892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough?
Berger VW; Weinstein S
Control Clin Trials; 2004 Oct; 25(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 15465620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers.
Doig GS; Simpson F
J Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3. PubMed ID: 16139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.
Berger VW; Ivanova A; Knoll MD
Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3017-28. PubMed ID: 12973784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the second role of the random element in minimization.
Kuznetsova OM
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):587-8. PubMed ID: 20673852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.
Borm GF; Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Peer PG
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3535-47. PubMed ID: 16007575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
Brown DC
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rank-Minimization for balanced assignment of subjects in clinical trials.
Stigsby B; Taves DR
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Mar; 31(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 20004741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IRINI: random group allocation of multiple prognostic factors.
Kasturi J; Geisler JG; Liu J; Kirchner T; Amaratunga D; Lubomirski M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 21187163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomization. Part 3: allocation concealment and randomization implementation.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):126-8. PubMed ID: 22196195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A meta-epidemiological study.
Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 21474279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation.
Han B; Enas NH; McEntegart D
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(27):3329-46. PubMed ID: 19739238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
