140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21349140)
1. Pulse contour analysis: is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
Critchley LA
Crit Care; 2011 Jan; 15(1):106. PubMed ID: 21349140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters.
Hadian M; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR
Crit Care; 2010; 14(6):R212. PubMed ID: 21092290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring to assess dynamic changes in cardiac output at the bedside.
Pinsky MR
Crit Care; 2011; 15(2):406; author reply 406. PubMed ID: 21418548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter.
Lamia B; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Feb; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 28188408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of acute pulmonary hypertension on cardiac output measurements: calibrated pulse contour analysis, transpulmonary and pulmonary artery thermodilution against a modified Fick method in an animal model.
Kutter APN; Mosing M; Hartnack S; Raszplewicz J; Renggli M; Mauch JY; Hofer CK
Anesth Analg; 2015 Jul; 121(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 25742632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.
Cho YJ; Koo CH; Kim TK; Hong DM; Jeon Y
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Dec; 30(6):771-782. PubMed ID: 26429135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Continuous Cardiac Output Measurement With the LiDCOplus System During Intra-Aortic Counterpulsation After Cardiac Surgery.
Menger J; Mora B; Skhirtladze K; Fischer A; Jan Ankersmit H; Dworschak M
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):592-8. PubMed ID: 26718662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of agreement and trending ability between transpulmonary thermodilution and calibrated pulse contour and pulse power cardiac output monitoring methods against pulmonary artery thermodilution in anesthetized dogs.
Kutter AP; Bettschart-Wolfensberger R; Romagnoli N; Bektas RN
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2016 Jul; 26(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 26754858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved Performance of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System for Tracking Cardiac Output Changes.
Suehiro K; Tanaka K; Mikawa M; Uchihara Y; Matsuyama T; Matsuura T; Funao T; Yamada T; Mori T; Nishikawa K
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2015; 29(3):656-62. PubMed ID: 25440654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, and real-time pulmonary artery thermodilution for the continuous measurement of cardiac output.
Bein B; Worthmann F; Tonner PH; Paris A; Steinfath M; Hedderich J; Scholz J
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2004 Apr; 18(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15073709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac output--pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Ostergaard M; Nielsen J; Rasmussen JP; Berthelsen PG
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1044-9. PubMed ID: 16987334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology.
Breukers RB; Jansen JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 15101866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between cardiac output measured by the pulmonary arterial thermodilution technique and that measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique in a pediatric animal model.
Rupérez M; López-Herce J; García C; Sánchez C; García E; Vigil D
Pediatr Cardiol; 2004; 25(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 14681741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transesophageal Doppler reliably tracks changes in cardiac output in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.
Møller-Sørensen H; Cordtz J; Østergaard M; Nilsson JC; Hansen KL
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 26578096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac output by intravascular pulse contour analysis: a prospective criterion standard study in patients after cardiac surgery.
Zöllner C; Haller M; Weis M; Mörstedt K; Lamm P; Kilger E; Goetz AE
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2000 Apr; 14(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 10794327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update.
Sangkum L; Liu GL; Yu L; Yan H; Kaye AD; Liu H
J Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):461-80. PubMed ID: 26961819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The PiCCO monitor: a review.
Litton E; Morgan M
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2012 May; 40(3):393-409. PubMed ID: 22577904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.
Maass SW; Roekaerts PM; Lancé MD
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 24746334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit: pulmonary artery catheter versus PiCCO].
Gassanov N; Caglayan E; Nia A; Erdmann E; Er F
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Feb; 136(8):376-80. PubMed ID: 21332037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semi-invasive measurement of cardiac output based on pulse contour: a review and analysis.
Schlöglhofer T; Gilly H; Schima H
Can J Anaesth; 2014 May; 61(5):452-79. PubMed ID: 24643474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
