These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21349507)

  • 1. Processing of perceptual information is more robust than processing of conceptual information in preschool-age children: evidence from costs of switching.
    Fisher AV
    Cognition; 2011 May; 119(2):253-64. PubMed ID: 21349507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The target of task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 20565179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Look but don't touch: Tactile disadvantage in processing modality-specific words.
    Connell L; Lynott D
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19903564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs.
    Kieffaber PD; Hetrick WP
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Jan; 42(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 15720581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries.
    Wong J; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):8-23. PubMed ID: 19271811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.
    Chevalier N; Blaye A; Dufau S; Lucenet J
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):955-72. PubMed ID: 20604615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modulation of specific brain activity by the perceptual analysis of very subtle geometrical relationships of the Mangina-Test stimuli: a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigation in young healthy adults.
    Mangina CA; Beuzeron-Mangina H; Casarotto S; Chiarenza GA; Pietrini P; Ricciardi E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Aug; 73(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 19414049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs.
    Vermeulen N; Corneille O; Niedenthal PM
    Cognition; 2008 Nov; 109(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 18996513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early selection of diagnostic facial information in the human visual cortex.
    Joyce CA; Schyns PG; Gosselin F; Cottrell GW; Rossion B
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):800-13. PubMed ID: 16266735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental differences in implicit and explicit memory performance.
    Perez LA; Peynircioğlu ZF; Blaxton TA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 Sep; 70(3):167-85. PubMed ID: 9742178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorization by schema relations and perceptual similarity in 5-year-olds and adults: A study in vision and in audition.
    Berger C; Donnadieu S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Apr; 93(4):304-21. PubMed ID: 16330042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.
    Chouinard MM
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2007; 72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. PubMed ID: 17394580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How children use examples to make conditional predictions.
    Kalish CW
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 20362979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study.
    Schettino A; Loeys T; Delplanque S; Pourtois G
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21237274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual bias following visual target selection.
    Vink M; Kahn RS; Raemaekers M; Ramsey NF
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 25(4):1168-74. PubMed ID: 15850734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.