198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21350088)
1. A synoptic reporting system for peripheral blood smear interpretation.
Jaso J; Nguyen A; Nguyen AN
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 135(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 21350088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist.
Mohanty SK; Piccoli AL; Devine LJ; Patel AA; William GC; Winters SB; Becich MJ; Parwani AV
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jul; 7():144. PubMed ID: 17672904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpretation of coagulation test results using a web-based reporting system.
Quesada AE; Jabcuga CE; Nguyen A; Wahed A; Nedelcu E; Nguyen AN
Lab Med; 2014; 45(4):347-60. PubMed ID: 25316668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of a synoptic data tool for reporting of head and neck neoplasms based on the College of American Pathologists cancer checklists.
Kang HP; Devine LJ; Piccoli AL; Seethala RR; Amin W; Parwani AV
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Oct; 132(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 19762529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synoptic reporting in tumor pathology: advantages of a web-based system.
Qu Z; Ninan S; Almosa A; Chang KG; Kuruvilla S; Nguyen N
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 127(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 17509987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting.
Hammond EH; Flinner RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Nov; 121(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 9372744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project.
Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C; Winters S; Gerlach K; Schwenn M; Perriello D
J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):117-24; quiz 163-5. PubMed ID: 20795553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma.
Karim RZ; van den Berg KS; Colman MH; McCarthy SW; Thompson JF; Scolyer RA
Histopathology; 2008 Jan; 52(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 18184262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone Marrow Synoptic Reporting for Hematologic Neoplasms: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
Sever C; Abbott CL; de Baca ME; Khoury JD; Perkins SL; Reichard KK; Taylor A; Terebelo HR; Colasacco C; Rumble RB; Thomas NE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Sep; 140(9):932-49. PubMed ID: 26905483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports.
Leslie KO; Rosai J
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Nov; 11(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 7878300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports - so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists.
Lankshear S; Srigley J; McGowan T; Yurcan M; Sawka C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1599-602. PubMed ID: 23432456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recommendations for the reporting of pleural mesothelioma.
Butnor KJ; Sporn TA; Ordonez NG;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1587-9. PubMed ID: 17276491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deficiencies in pathological reporting of colorectal cancer in Victoria.
Winn RD; Robinson DR; Farmer KC; Bell SW
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):796-9. PubMed ID: 18844912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement in the accuracy of reporting key prognostic and anatomic findings during thyroidectomy by using a novel Web-based synoptic operative reporting system.
Chambers AJ; Pasieka JL; Temple WJ
Surgery; 2009 Dec; 146(6):1090-8. PubMed ID: 19958936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of histopathological reporting on melanoma and influence of use of a synoptic template.
Haydu LE; Holt PE; Karim RZ; Madronio CM; Thompson JF; Armstrong BK; Scolyer RA
Histopathology; 2010 May; 56(6):768-74. PubMed ID: 20546342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of scanned document management with the anatomic pathology laboratory information system: analysis of benefits.
Schmidt RA; Simmons K; Grimm EE; Middlebrooks M; Changchien R
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Nov; 126(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 17050064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in the pathology reporting of rectal cancer: is it time to adopt synoptic reporting?
Hemmings C; Jeffery M; Frizelle F
N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U513. PubMed ID: 12897881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.
Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A; Raby M; Ross J; Kramer S; Sawka C
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19466743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation and evaluation of a negation tagger in a pipeline-based system for information extract from pathology reports.
Mitchell KJ; Becich MJ; Berman JJ; Chapman WW; Gilbertson J; Gupta D; Harrison J; Legowski E; Crowley RS
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):663-7. PubMed ID: 15360896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
