These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2135054)

  • 21. Does an initial phasic response exist in the receptor potential of taste cells?
    Sato T
    Experientia; 1976 Nov; 32(11):1426-8. PubMed ID: 1086797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanism of enhancement of the responses of the frog glossopharyngeal nerve to electrolytes by enhancers.
    Okuda-Akabane K; Fukami H; Kitada Y
    Chem Senses; 2008 Jul; 33(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 18487524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Study of the "stimulus--excitation" function in the peripheral portion of the frog taste analyzer].
    Shmarov DA; Samoĭlov VO
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1979 Apr; 65(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 313346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neurophysiological and biophysical evidence on the mechanism of electric taste.
    Herness MS
    J Gen Physiol; 1985 Jul; 86(1):59-87. PubMed ID: 2993476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Voltage clamping of a frog (Rana catesbeiana) taste cell with a single microelectrode.
    Okada Y; Miyamoto T; Sato T
    Comp Biochem Physiol Comp Physiol; 1993 Sep; 106(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 8104758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transcellular labeling by DiI demonstrates the glossopharyngeal innervation of taste buds in the lingual epithelium of the axolotl.
    Nagai T
    J Comp Neurol; 1993 May; 331(1):122-33. PubMed ID: 8320345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tonic activity of parasympathetic efferent nerve fibers hyperpolarizes the resting membrane potential of frog taste cells.
    Sato T; Nishishita K; Kato Y; Okada Y; Toda K
    Chem Senses; 2006 May; 31(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 16469796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lack of amiloride sensitivity in SHR and WKY glossopharyngeal taste responses to NaCl.
    Formaker BK; Hill DL
    Physiol Behav; 1991 Oct; 50(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 1775551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Amiloride does not block taste transduction in the mouse (Slc:ICR).
    Tonosaki K; Funakoshi M
    Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol; 1989; 94(4):659-61. PubMed ID: 2575952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Response properties of cerebellar neurons to stimulation of the frog glossopharyngeal nerve and tongue.
    Hanamori T; Ishiko N
    Brain Res Bull; 1987 Apr; 18(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 3496939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of antidromic stimulation of the glossopharyngeal nerve on afferent discharges occurring with and without sensory stimulation of the frog tongue.
    Murayama N; Ishiko N
    Neurosci Lett; 1985 Sep; 60(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 3877259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electrical response to hypotonic NaCl Ringer solution across the dorsal epithelium of the tongue of the frog, Rana catesbeiana.
    Soeda H; Sakudo F
    Arch Oral Biol; 1987; 32(10):763-4. PubMed ID: 2451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vasopressin increases frog gustatory neural responses elicited by NaCl and HCl.
    Okada Y; Miyamoto T; Sato T
    Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol; 1991; 100(3):693-6. PubMed ID: 1685977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Taste transduction mechanism: similar effects of various modifications of gustatory receptors on neural responses to chemical and electrical stimulation in the frog.
    Kashiwayanagi M; Yoshii K; Kobatake Y; Kurihara K
    J Gen Physiol; 1981 Sep; 78(3):259-75. PubMed ID: 6173463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Membrane resistance change of the frog taste cells in response to water and Nacl.
    Sato T; Beidler LM
    J Gen Physiol; 1975 Dec; 66(6):735-63. PubMed ID: 1104762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interaction among different sensory units within a single fungiform papilla in the frog tongue.
    Murayama N
    J Gen Physiol; 1988 May; 91(5):685-701. PubMed ID: 3262148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrical response to acid across the dorsal epithelium of the frog tongue.
    Soeda H; Sakudo F; Noda K
    Arch Oral Biol; 1986; 31(11):775-9. PubMed ID: 2823757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mechanism of the water response in frog gustation: possible significance of surface potential.
    Sugawara M; Kashiwayanagi M; Kurihara K
    Brain Res; 1989 May; 486(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 2786441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The origin of slow potentials on the tongue surface induced by frog glossopharyngeal efferent fiber stimulation.
    Sato T; Toda K; Miyamoto T; Okada Y; Fujiyama R
    Chem Senses; 2000 Oct; 25(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 11015330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aldosterone increases gustatory neural response to NaCl in frog.
    Okada Y; Miyamoto T; Sato T
    Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol; 1990; 97(4):535-6. PubMed ID: 1981033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.