These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2135104)

  • 21. [Comparative electron microscopy scanning study of Homodent-1 and Goodfill silver amalgam powders].
    Szabó J; Herczegh B; Bánóczy J; Szabó I
    Fogorv Sz; 1990 Apr; 83(4):99-103. PubMed ID: 2354735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of two different T-grain films in rare-earth screens with a standard film-screen combination for intravenous pyelography and bone examinations.
    Logan H; Daly L; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):237-40. PubMed ID: 2702380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of Flow and Kodak dental X-ray films by means of perceptibility curves.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Apr; 51(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8498162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitometric comparison of dental films of groups D and E.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Aug; 54(2):250-2. PubMed ID: 6956842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The influence of the spectrum and the type of exposure on the contrast of double-sided coated x-ray film].
    Blendl C; Bollen R; Freytag KH
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1457475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing the sensitometric properties of dental X-ray films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 126(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 7897103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of developer temperature changes on the sensitometric properties of direct exposure and screen-film imaging systems.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2599232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A sensitometric comparison of Fuji Super HR-G and Kodak T-mat G panoramic films.
    Benson BW; Frederiksen NL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 May; 79(5):646-8. PubMed ID: 7600231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors involved in the high radiographic sensitivity of E-speed films.
    Domon M; Yoshino N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Jan; 69(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 2296442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of developer exhaustion on Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed dental films.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 7614150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic films].
    Andersen HE
    Tandlaegebladet; 1983 Sep; 87(15):513-6. PubMed ID: 6581558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emulsion clearing characteristics in the processing of dental radiographic films.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 May; 18(2):49-52. PubMed ID: 2635118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Automated treatment of dental radiographic films].
    Bollengier F
    Inf Dent; 1991 Jan; 73(5):273-86. PubMed ID: 2001890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system.
    Schmidt RA; Doi K; Sekiya M; Xu XW; Giger ML; Lu CT; Mojtahedi S; MacMahon H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 May; 154(5):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2108553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
    Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two dental x-ray films compared for rater preference using endodontic views.
    Kleier DJ; Benner SJ; Averbach RE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 3885130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Image quality comparisons of X-Omat RP, L and B films.
    Van Dis ML; Beck FM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):132-4. PubMed ID: 1807996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of films processed in automatic and manual processors.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Nov; 50(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 6935603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Analysis of variations of exposure and development times of Kodak (Ektaspeed) and Agfa-Gevaert (Dentus M-2) periapical films].
    de Pinho MB; Tavano O; Lopes ES
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1987; 1(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 3507982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An old/new idea for reducing exposure to x-rays.
    Colquitt WN; Richards AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 6960314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.