These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2135123)

  • 1. [Some characteristics of orthodontic treatment in high mandibular cases].
    Baba M
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Mar; 28(1 Pt 2):499-507. PubMed ID: 2135123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Orthodontic treatment of overbite with an appliance for raising the anterior vertical dimension. Part 2].
    Bolender CJ; Chemouni-Benayoun S
    Orthod Fr; 2001 Dec; 72(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 11820030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior impaction with orthodontic miniscrews for openbite closure and improvement of facial profile.
    Kravitz ND; Kusnoto B
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 17580510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype.
    Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Features and treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with severe lateral mandibular shift and asymmetric vertical dimension.
    Kondo E
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 15615138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction.
    Sivakumar A; Valiathan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):869-75. PubMed ID: 18538251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
    Efstratiadis S; Baumrind S; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Laster L; Ghafari J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects and anchorage potential of sliding mechanics with titanium screws compared with the Tweed-Merrifield technique.
    Park HS; Yoon DY; Park CS; Jeoung SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 18405824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthodontic compensation in skeletal Class III malocclusion: a case report.
    de Figueiredo MA; Siqueira DF; Bommarito S; Scanavini MA
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(4):385-96. PubMed ID: 18092524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosis and treatment planning of hypodivergent skeletal pattern with clockwise occlusal plane rotation.
    Sarver DM; Weissman SM; Johnston MW
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 8228427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.