These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21351310)

  • 21. [Detection and evaluation of adverse drug effects].
    Thürmann PA; Schmitt K
    Med Klin (Munich); 2000 May; 95(1 Spec No):4-8. PubMed ID: 10851841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Under-reporting of serious adverse drug reactions in Sweden.
    Bäckström M; Mjörndal T; Dahlqvist R
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2004 Jul; 13(7):483-7. PubMed ID: 15269932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reporting adverse drug reactions on a geriatric ward: a pilot project.
    Somers A; Petrovic M; Robays H; Bogaert M
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2003 Feb; 58(10):707-14. PubMed ID: 12610749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection on adverse drug reaction spontaneous reporting database of Guangdong province in China.
    Li C; Xia J; Deng J; Jiang J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jun; 17(6):593-600. PubMed ID: 18432629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. New guideline for tramadol usage following adverse drug reactions reported to the Iranian Pharmacovigilance Center.
    Gholami K; Shalviri G; Zarbakhsh A; Daryabari N; Yousefian S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Feb; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 17063533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selected control events and reporting odds ratio in signal detection methodology.
    Ooba N; Kubota K
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Nov; 19(11):1159-65. PubMed ID: 20669233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adverse drug reactions in a south Indian hospital--their severity and cost involved.
    Ramesh M; Pandit J; Parthasarathi G
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2003 Dec; 12(8):687-92. PubMed ID: 14762985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the positive predictive values of antidote signals to detect potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the medical intensive care unit (ICU).
    Kane-Gill SL; Bellamy CJ; Verrico MM; Handler SM; Weber RJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1185-91. PubMed ID: 19728294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Differences in the relative incidence of adverse drug reactions in relation to age? An evaluation of the spontaneous reporting system of SANZ (Swiss Drug Monitoring Center)].
    Ciorciaro C; Hartmann K; Kuhn M
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1998 Feb; 128(7):254-8. PubMed ID: 9540150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Parental reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions in children in Lagos, Nigeria.
    Oshikoya KA; Senbanjo IO; Njokanma OF
    Arch Dis Child; 2009 Jun; 94(6):469-73. PubMed ID: 19147621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ten years of adverse drug reaction reports for the multiple sclerosis immunomodulatory therapies: a Canadian perspective.
    Tremlett HL; Oger J
    Mult Scler; 2008 Jan; 14(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 17881392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality check of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting forms of different countries.
    Bandekar MS; Anwikar SR; Kshirsagar NA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Nov; 19(11):1181-5. PubMed ID: 20845409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions.
    van Puijenbroek EP; Bate A; Leufkens HG; Lindquist M; Orre R; Egberts AC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002; 11(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 11998548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Adverse drug reactions in childhood. A drug surveillance study in Sicily].
    Cutroneo PM; Arcoraci V; Cucinotta G; Inferrera G; Galante F; Sofia A; Ferrera E; Napolitano T; Mazzaglia G; Caputi AP
    Recenti Prog Med; 1998 Jun; 89(6):290-5. PubMed ID: 9658895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A knowledge based approach for automated signal generation in pharmacovigilance.
    Henegar C; Bousquet C; Lillo-Le Louët A; Degoulet P; Jaulent MC
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):626-30. PubMed ID: 15360888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Reporting of adverse drug reactions in Iceland in 1999 to 2004].
    Jóhannsson M; Agústsdóttir E
    Laeknabladid; 2006 Apr; 92(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 16582456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characteristics associated with ability to prevent adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients.
    Seeger JD; Kong SX; Schumock GT
    Pharmacotherapy; 1998; 18(6):1284-9. PubMed ID: 9855328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: a preliminary study in hospitalized patients.
    Calderón-Ospina C; Bustamante-Rojas C
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Aug; 18(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 20636675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ADR related questions received by a telephone medicines information service and ADRs received by a spontaneous ADR reporting system: a comparison regarding patients and drugs.
    Egberts AC; de Koning FH; Meyboom RH; Leufkens HG
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 1997 Jul; 6(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 15073778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improved reporting of adverse drug reactions.
    Kimelblatt BJ; Young SH; Heywood PM; Mandala AR; Gendelman S; Mehl B
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1988 May; 45(5):1086-9. PubMed ID: 3400650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.