These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies. Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The nasopharynx, face height, and overbite. Kerr WJ Angle Orthod; 1985 Jan; 55(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3856405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of soft tissue facial morphometry in children with Class I and Class II occlusions. Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Puletto S; Bignotto M; Tartaglia G Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 7814923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dental arch width in Class II Division 2 deep-bite malocclusion. Walkow TM; Peck S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 12490871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dentofacial characteristics of growing patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a morphological study. Morel-Verdebout C; Botteron S; Kiliaridis S Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 17974540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study. Siriwat PP; Jarabak JR Angle Orthod; 1985 Apr; 55(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 3874569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Evaluation of the changes occurring in the vertical direction of the face in cases treated with activator + occipital headgear combination]. Altuğ Z; Işeri H; Bayazit Z; Gögen H Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 2489156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype. Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance. Biren S; Erverdi N J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1993 Sep; 1(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 9582640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types. Miralles R; Hevia R; Contreras L; Carvajal R; Bull R; Manns A Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 1763838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Class II Division 2 malocclusion: a heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed jaws. Peck S; Peck L; Kataja M Angle Orthod; 1998 Feb; 68(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 9503130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions. Anderson D; Popovich F Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2923320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Morphological characteristics of the symphyseal region in adult skeletal Class III crossbite and openbite malocclusions. Chung CJ; Jung S; Baik HS Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18193946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the effects of passive posterior bite-blocks with different construction bites on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures. Iscan HN; Sarisoy L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 9267229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cephalometric features of anterior open bite. Taibah SM; Feteih RM World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17580508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Overbite and face height in 44 male subjects with class I, class II/1 and class II/2 occlusion. Adams CP; Kerr WJ Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 6941889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Mandibular first molar relation to variable lower face skeletal components. Andria LM; Leite LP; Dunlap AM; Cooper EC; King LB Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 17029555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions. Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]