These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2135328)

  • 1. [Evaluation of cervical discrepancy of gold crowns in stone dies from various impression materials].
    Mantovani AV; Stephano CB; Roselino RF; Roselino RB; Campos GM
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 2135328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique.
    Ratnaweera PM; Yoshida K; Miura H; Kohta A; Tsuchihira K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Sep; 50(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15074361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of four different die materials before and after disinfection of the impression: an in vitro study.
    Nandini Y; Vinitha KB; Manvi S; Smitha M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 24309347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Measuring the accuracy of various elastomeric impression materials using a CNC coordinate measuring device (Part 1)].
    Wichmann M; Borchers L; Limmroth E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Aug; 45(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 2269183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of cervical relining of acrylic resin copings on the accuracy of stone dies obtained using a polyether impression material.
    de Sá AT; de Freitas CA; de Sá FC; Ursi WJ; Simões TC; de Freitas MF
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 19089282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Copper electroplating of non-aqueous elastomeric impression materials: a subjective appraisal of their platability.
    Payne JA; Jeganathan S
    Singapore Dent J; 1994 Jan; 19(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 9582678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal fit of nickel-chromium copings before and after internal adjustments with duplicated stone dies and disclosing agent.
    Ushiwata O; de Moraes JV; Bottino MA; da Silva EG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):634-43. PubMed ID: 10842130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproduction of details using dental stones and investment material in impressions of elastomers and waxes.
    Nilner K; Owall B
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):249-55. PubMed ID: 6963007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cervical adaptation of complete cast crowns of various metal alloys, with and without die spacers].
    Stephano CB; Roselino RF; Roselino RB; Campos GM
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 2490837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postcementation marginal fit of a new ceramic foil crown system.
    Hummert T; Barghi N; Berry T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):766-70. PubMed ID: 1432797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of wax, autopolymerized, and light-polymerized resin pattern materials.
    Iglesias A; Powers JM; Pierpont HP
    J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 9028225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping.
    Coli P; Karlsson S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 15008234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Dimensional change and deformation on stone dies for full cast crowns. Differences according to impression methods using vinyl silicone impression materials].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe M; Tejima R; Takigawa T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1989 Jun; 27(2):429-40. PubMed ID: 2700283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of impression-die systems on crown margins.
    Plekavich EJ; Joncas JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Jun; 49(6):772-6. PubMed ID: 6348258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relating the marginal fit of the castings to the accuracy of the impressions made from laminated hydrocolloid impression technique: a comparative study.
    Sinha MR; Thakur B; Gaikwad A; Chaudhari LD; Kulkarni A; Kulkarni H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Mar; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-fusing counterdies for measuring accuracy of dies or impression materials.
    Stackhouse JA; Yoon W; Von Hagen S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Feb; 71(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 8126680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.