These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21353927)

  • 1. Effect of facial asymmetry on 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements.
    Gateno J; Xia JJ; Teichgraeber JF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):655-62. PubMed ID: 21353927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery.
    Gateno J; Xia JJ; Teichgraeber JF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):606-22. PubMed ID: 21257250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: a new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Leung MY; Leung YY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29636307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.
    Meloti AF; Gonçalves Rde C; Silva E; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):80-8. PubMed ID: 25279525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
    Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study.
    Ho CT; Lin HH; Liou EJ; Lo LJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40423. PubMed ID: 28071714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional vector analysis of mandibular structural asymmetry.
    Park KR; Park HS; Piao Z; Kim MK; Yu HS; Seo JK; Lee SH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 23347884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities.
    Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji Y; Muramatsu A; Yoshida K; Goto S; Kurita K; Ariji E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Sep; 102(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 16920547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography.
    Kwon TG; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15925488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements.
    Jodeh DS; Kuykendall LV; Ford JM; Ruso S; Decker SJ; Rottgers SA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1568-1571. PubMed ID: 31299770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Teleradiographic analysis of the face in facial asymmetry].
    Jammet P; Souyris F; Rey PA; Atlan G
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1991; 92(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 1891694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
    Sanders DA; Chandhoke TK; Uribe FA; Rigali PH; Nanda R
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 24935152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile.
    Cheung LK; Chan YM; Jayaratne YS; Lo J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):e56-73. PubMed ID: 21665497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.
    Nalçaci R; Oztürk F; Sökücü O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 20100922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison between computer aided simulation and dental model orthognathic surgery for the treatment of patients with mandibular excess and facial asymmetries].
    Shen SY; Chen TT; Lu CP; Jiang TF; Wang XD; Shen GF
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):651-655. PubMed ID: 27806756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unilateral mandibulomaxillar synostosis as a single anomaly in a newborn.
    Nikolic S; Lukac B; Bokun J; Jasovic A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):843-6. PubMed ID: 16631495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.
    Park JU; Kook YA; Kim Y
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):860-7. PubMed ID: 22356706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.