These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2135423)

  • 1. [Consistency of zinc oxide-eugenol impression materials].
    Gomes WL; Santos JF; Muench A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 2135423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 13(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15032895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The use of energy in casting and the viscosity of zinc oxide-eugenol pastes].
    Schwickerath H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1975 Aug; 30(8):527-30. PubMed ID: 1058094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Factors affecting the setting time of zinc oxide-eugenol impression materials--the influence of humidity and temperature to the reaction velocity].
    Kumagai K; Tamiya N; Iwamoto K; Taniguchi Y; Takeda H; Kikuzuki K; Nemoto H; Hirai T; Hase T; Yamada Y
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Feb; 33(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 2489688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation of the rheological properties of several interocclusal registration materials.
    Chai J; Leong DK; Pang IC
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Sep; 3(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 7874254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL IMPRESSION PASTES.
    NEVIN JJ
    CAL; 1965 Apr; 27():20-4. PubMed ID: 14283470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part III: resistance to compression after setting.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 15610544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impression materials for recording the denture bearing mucosa.
    Koran A
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jan; 24(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 6987107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zinc oxide-eugenol impression pastes.
    Nevin JJ
    CAL; 1970 Aug; 33(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 5271364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytotoxicity of impression materials.
    Sydiskis RJ; Gerhardt DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 8463975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical properties of the zinc oxide--eugenol impression pastes.
    MYERS GE; PEYTON FA
    J Dent Res; 1961; 40():39-48. PubMed ID: 13727211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Council approves American Dental Association specification No. 16 for impression paste--zinc oxide-eugenol type.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1961 Jul; 63():164-7. PubMed ID: 14447642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate denture impression technique using zinc-oxide and eugenol and rubber base impression material.
    Chaney SA
    Dent J; 1977 Mar; 43(3):130-1. PubMed ID: 323026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the powder/liquid ratio on the properties of zinc oxide-eugenol-based root canal sealers.
    Camps J; Pommel L; Bukiet F; About I
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):915-23. PubMed ID: 15501319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apparent viscosity of materials used for making edentulous impressions.
    Koran A; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1977 Jul; 95(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 267656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impression technique for RPDs. A comparison between two methods.
    Gunne J; Högström J; Nilson H
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 2264016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Properties of zinc oxide-eugenol impression pastes.
    Tyas MJ; Wilson HJ
    Br Dent J; 1970 Nov; 129(10):461-6. PubMed ID: 5278370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Physical properties of zinc oxide-eugenol impression materials as affected by additional agents].
    Kobayashi K
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Apr; 30(2):405-20. PubMed ID: 3459961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study of the effect of aged eugenol on the flow, setting time and adhesion of Grossman root canal sealer.
    Mendonça SC; de Carvalho Júnior JR; Guerisoli DM; Pécora JD; de Sousa-Neto MD
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 11210266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.