BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21354732)

  • 1. MRI of the prostate: interobserver agreement compared with histopathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Ruprecht O; Weisser P; Bodelle B; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):456-60. PubMed ID: 21354732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging--early experience.
    Fütterer JJ; Heijmink SW; Scheenen TW; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 16304091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endorectal MR imaging before salvage prostatectomy: tumor localization and staging.
    Sala E; Eberhardt SC; Akin O; Moskowitz CS; Onyebuchi CN; Kuroiwa K; Ishill N; Zelefsky MJ; Eastham JA; Hricak H
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 16373766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: correlation of imaging findings with whole-mount step section histopathology.
    Graser A; Heuck A; Sommer B; Massmann J; Scheidler J; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 17179349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level].
    Wetter A; Ajdukovic AN; Fliessbach K; Lehnert T; Engl T; Jacobi V; Vogl TJ
    Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16607587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phased array magnetic resonance imaging for staging clinically localised prostrate cancer.
    Borre M; Lundorf E; Marcussen N; Langkilde NC; Wolf H
    Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(6):589-92. PubMed ID: 16294442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Locoregional staging of prostatic carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in 75 patients treated with radical prostatectomy].
    Gualdi GF; Casciani E; Ferriano MG; Polettini E
    Radiol Med; 1998 May; 95(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 9687928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma. Comparison with histologic macrosections in 40 cases].
    Torricelli P; Iadanza M; De Santis M; Pollastri CA; Cesinaro AM; Trentini G; Romagnoli R
    Radiol Med; 1999 Jun; 97(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 10478207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers.
    Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Huisman HJ; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-van De Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):541-9. PubMed ID: 16244263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of high resolution (1.5 tesla) pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging prostate cancer in candidates for radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective study.
    Renard-Penna R; Rouprêt M; Comperat E; Ayed A; Coudert M; Mozer P; Xylinas E; Bitker MO; Grenier P
    Urol Oncol; 2013 May; 31(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 21775172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?
    Latchamsetty KC; Borden LS; Porter CR; Lacrampe M; Vaughan M; Lin E; Conti N; Wright JL; Corman JM
    Can J Urol; 2007 Feb; 14(1):3429-34. PubMed ID: 17324322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology.
    Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Barentsz JO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):845-52. PubMed ID: 8610561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
    Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.
    Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
    Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Magnetic resonance with an endorectal coil and a fast spin echo sequence in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. The correlation with histopathological data].
    Masi A; Olmastroni M; Marin E; Consalvo M; Lascialfari L; Ricupero L; Nicita G; Villari D; Amorosi A; Villari N
    Radiol Med; 1997 Nov; 94(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 9465216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Staging of prostatic carcinoma at 1.5-T MRI: correlation of a simplified MRI exam with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Van Holsbeeck A; Degroote A; De Wever L; Vanhoutte E; De Keyzer F; Van Poppel H; Oyen R
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20160101. PubMed ID: 27181821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
    Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
    Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.